MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Ca <sub>v</sub> 3.1 Channels Modulate Ca <sub>v</sub> 1.2 Functional Coupling: Implications to Myogenic Response

2025· article· en· W4411874958 on OpenAlexaff
Galina Yu. Mironova, Donald G. Welsh

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysiology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCoupling (piping)Excitation–contraction couplingPhysicsChemistryBiophysicsCalciumBiologyMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction and Aim: Myogenic response is an autoregulatory arterial constriction to elevated blood pressure – a reflex essential for proper blood flow distribution. Historically, it’s mechanistic basis is explained as arterial depolarization opening voltage-gated Ca 2+ channels (VGCC), the primary subtype being L-type (Ca V 1.2). While unarguably important, additional regulatory mechanisms may exist including one where T-type (Ca V 3.1) Ca 2+ channels alone or in interaction with Ca V 1.2 play a facilitatory role in myogenic tone development. Methods: A detailed electrical analysis was completed using patch-clamp electrophysiology (whole-cell & cell-attached) on rodent cerebral arterial smooth muscle cells. Intracellular [Ca 2+ ] ([Ca 2+ ] i ) in resistant arteries was assessed using pressure myography and Fura-2AM. Results: Whole-cell patch-clamp revealed that pressure-like stimuli increased the Ca V 1.2, but not the Ca V 3.1 current. Single channel analysis tied the Ca V 1.2 activity rise to enhanced 1) functional coupling and 2) subunit trafficking to caveolae. Pressure-induced functional coupling was observed in intact arteries as manifested by elevated [Ca 2+ ] i (at 80 vs 20 mmHg) in the presence of 30 mM K + to standardize membrane potential (-40mV). To test the role of Ca V 3.1 in pressure-regulation of Ca V 1.2, single channel analysis was repeated in arterial myocytes from Ca V 3.1 −/− animals. Intriguingly, while pressure continued to foster Ca V 1.2 trafficking, it didn’t augment functional coupling. Likewise, we didn’t observe the elevated Ca 2+ response in arteries (at 80 vs 20 mmHg) when membrane potential was standardized. There was, however, evidence of higher baseline Ca V 1.2 activity in both experimental sets. Conclusions: Our results indicate that pressure increases Ca V 1.2 activity by enhancing perimembrane trafficking and functional coupling. We propose that the latter is tied to Ca V 3.1 and the induction of Ca 2+ -induced inactivation, an effect that partly dissipates as an artery depolarizes. The abolishment of Ca V 3.1 activity and thus the fine tuning of Ca V 1.2 functional coupling might facilitate arterial tone development in the hypertensive state. Supported by CIHR and Roraback Chair in Vascular Biology and Neuroscience. This abstract was presented at the American Physiology Summit 2025 and is only available in HTML format. There is no downloadable file or PDF version. The Physiology editorial board was not involved in the peer review process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysiology→Same topicCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias→French-language works237,207→