MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Does Biological Sex Modulate the Neural Control of Body Temperature during Heat Stress?

2025· article· en· W4411875163 on OpenAlexaffabout
Amine Dahhak, Earric Lee, Nicolas Pamart, Hsen Hsouna, Thomas A. Deshayes, Daniel Gagnon

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysiology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicThermoregulation and physiological responses
Canadian institutionsMontreal Heart Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHeat stressBiologyStress (linguistics)NeurosciencePhysiologyAnimal science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Understanding how thermoregulatory responses differ between males and females could contribute to a better understanding of sex-related differences in heat vulnerability. Previous studies have established that maximal sweating capacity is greater in males, likely due to greater cholinergic sensitivity of the eccrine sweat glands. However, it remains unknown if the neural control of body temperature during heat stress differs between males and females. OBJECTIVE & HYPOTHESIS: The objective of this study is to determine the effect of biological sex on the neural control of body temperature during heat stress. We hypothesized that the onset threshold for increases in skin sympathetic nerve activity (SSNA), local sweat rate (LSR), and cutaneous vascular conductance (CVC) would not differ between males and females during passive heat stress. Methods: Nine healthy males (23 to 32 years old) and eight healthy females (21 to 36 years old, low reproductive hormone phase) were exposed to passive heat stress with a water-perfused suit until core temperature increased by 1.2°C. SSNA was measured from the radial nerve by microneurography, on the same arm as measurements of forearm LSR and CVC. Core temperature was measured with an esophageal probe and mean skin temperature was calculated as a weighted mean of four measurement sites. Mean body temperature was calculated as a weighted summation of core (0.8) and mean skin (0.2) temperatures to determine the onset threshold for SSNA, LSR and CVC by segmented linear regression. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation or mean differences (males – females) with [95% confidence interval]. Results: Baseline mean body temperature was 36.08 ± 0.23°C for males and 36.29 ± 0.23°C for females. The change in mean body temperature at the onset threshold for SSNA was 0.59 ± 0.14°C for males and 0.89 ± 0.12°C for females (mean difference: -0.30°C [-0.43, -0.17]). The change in mean body temperature at the onset threshold for forearm LSR was 0.80 ± 0.25°C for males and 0.92 ± 0.26°C for females (mean difference: -0.12°C [-0.37, 0.13]). The change in mean body temperature at the onset threshold for forearm CVC was 0.80 ± 0.27°C for males and 0.89 ± 0.26°C for females (mean difference: -0.09°C [-0.36, 0.19]). Conclusion: These preliminary results suggest that females require a greater change in mean body temperature to increase skin sympathetic nerve activity, local sweat rate, and cutaneous vascular conductance during passive heat stress. The physiological importance of the differences observed remains to be determined. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada This abstract was presented at the American Physiology Summit 2025 and is only available in HTML format. There is no downloadable file or PDF version. The Physiology editorial board was not involved in the peer review process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.909
Threshold uncertainty score0.217

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysiologySame topicThermoregulation and physiological responsesFrench-language works237,207