Um panorama de conceitos financeiros nos currículos canadenses: o caso de juros simples e compostos
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Neste artigo, exploramos as maneiras pelas quais juros simples e compostos (referidos no artigo pelo acrônimo inglês SCI) são incorporados à matemática do ensino médio nos programas curriculares das províncias do Canadá. A análise comparativa de documentos de todos os dez currículos provinciais revelou uma miríade de abordagens que propõem que o SCI seja ensinado da 5ª à 12ª série para diferentes perfis de alunos (acadêmicos, não acadêmicos) em múltiplas vertentes matemáticas: aritmética (número), álgebra (discreto e funções exponenciais), dados e probabilidade, educação financeira, matemática financeira e vertentes específicas de finanças (banco, juros e crédito, gestão de dinheiro, etc.). No geral, essa inconsistência na integração do JSC no Canadá é provavelmente o resultado da falta de consenso na pesquisa em educação matemática em relação à alfabetização financeira e seu papel na disciplina de matemática.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.011 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.020 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".