MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411878309 · doi:10.1186/s40359-025-03047-7

The relationship between perceived social support and fear of childbirth in pregnant women: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2025· review· en· W4411878309 on OpenAlex
Zohreh Alizadeh-Dibazari, Mahsa Maghalian, Mojgan Mirghafourvand‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueBMC Psychology · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMaternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of TabrizTabriz University of Medical Sciences
KeywordsMeta-analysisPsychologyChildbirthSocial supportSocial psychologyPsychological researchSystematic reviewClinical psychologyMEDLINEPregnancyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Despite being a natural process, childbirth often evokes fear due to its unpredictable nature. This fear can lead to significant emotional distress and various physical and mental health complications. While social support from family, friends, and partners is thought to reduce fear, its effectiveness remains unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to determine the relationship between fear of childbirth and various sources of social support, including overall support, support from family, friends, and partners. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted across PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane, Scopus, SID, and Google Scholar for relevant studies published through November 2024. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Subgroup analyses were performed based on study quality. To determine result robustness, two separate sensitivity analyses were carried out: one in which individual studies were sequentially removed, and another where studies using different assessment tools were excluded. Finally, the influence of maternal age, gestational age, multiparity, and pregnancy planning on outcomes was examined through meta-regression analysis. RESULTS: From 1,542 screened studies, 17 were included (n = 5,535 women). Meta-analysis revealed significant inverse correlations between fear of childbirth and both perceived social support (r = -0.23, 95% CI -0.39 to -0.05, 16 studies, 5,435 women; p = 0.01; random-effects model) and partner support (r = -0.29, 95% CI -0.46 to -0.09, 5 studies, 1,254 women; p < 0.01; random-effects model). No significant associations emerged for family (r = -0.12, 95% CI -0.26 to 0.02, 3 studies, 530 women; p = 0.10; random-effects model) or friend support (r = -0.05, 95% CI -0.14 to 0.03, 3 studies, 530 women; p = 0.22; fixed-effects model). Results varied significantly by study quality (p < 0.001) but were unaffected by maternal characteristics in meta-regression. Sensitivity analyses confirmed result stability. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis suggests that greater social support, particularly from partners, can help alleviate fear of childbirth. However, support from friends and family did not show a clear link to reduced fear. Due to limitations in the quality of the studies reviewed, further high-quality research is needed to draw definitive conclusions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.857
Threshold uncertainty score0.475

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.237
GPT teacher head0.491
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it