MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The modulatory role of myogenic tone on alpha-1 adrenergic-mediated cerebral vasomotor responses

2025· article· en· W4411880492 on OpenAlexaff
Adam M.S. Luchkanych, Thomas J. Jurrissen, Cameron J. Morse, Corey R. Tomczak, T. Dylan Olver

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysiology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVasomotorAlpha (finance)AdrenergicNeuroscienceTone (literature)Adrenergic receptorAlpha-2 adrenergic receptorMedicineEndocrinologyInternal medicineBiologyReceptorClinical psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Myogenic reactivity and alpha-1 adrenergic signalling contribute to the regulation of cerebrovascular tone. Whether the level of myogenic tone influences alpha-1 adrenergic signalling in the cerebral circulation is unclear. Therefore, the purpose of the present study was to explore whether myogenic tone influences alpha-1 adrenergic-mediated vasoconstriction in isolated cerebral arteries. It was hypothesized that myogenic tone and alpha-1 adrenergic-mediated vasoconstriction would act synergistically to enhance cerebral artery tone (i.e., arteries with higher myogenic tone would display the greatest constriction to alpha-1 adrenergic agonism). Middle cerebral arteries from swine were harvested and downstream branches (1A and 3A) were isolated, mounted in a pressure myograph, and set to a resting intraluminal pressure of 60 mmHg. Myogenic tone was recorded and vasomotor responses to alpha-1 adrenergic agonism (phenylephrine) were compared in 1A ( n = 6) vs. 3A ( n = 7) arteries. Resting myogenic tone was greater in 3A vs. 1A arteries (13 ± 8% vs. 24 ± 8%, P = 0.023) and alpha-1 adrenergic-mediated vasoconstriction was less in 3A vs. 1A arteries (15 ± 9% vs. 30 ± 9%, P = 0.012). This finding suggests increased myogenic tone does not potentiate alpha-1 adrenergic vasoconstriction. Subsequently, to examine the role of myogenic tone independent of arterial branch order, cerebral vasomotor responses to alpha-1 adrenergic agonism (phenylephrine) were assessed in 1A arteries at high (80 mmHg; n = 4) vs. low (40 mmHg; n = 4) intraluminal pressure. Myogenic tone was greater in high- vs. low-pressure conditions (35 ± 6% vs. 19 ± 14%, P = 0.036) and alpha-1 adrenergic-mediated vasoconstriction was lower in high- vs. low-pressure conditions (5 ± 9% vs. 16 ± 10%, P = 0.003). To isolate the role of myogenic tone from differences in intraluminal pressure, 1A arteries were pre-treated with the L-type calcium channel blocker nifedipine. Differences in myogenic tone between the high (80 mmHg; n = 4) and low (40 mmHg; n = 4) intraluminal pressures were abolished in arteries pre-treated with the L-type calcium channel blockade (14 ± 14% vs. 9 ± 7%, P = 0.400). L-type calcium channel blockade likewise attenuated differences in alpha-1 adrenergic-mediated vasoconstriction at high- vs. low-pressure conditions (3 ± 2% vs. 10 ± 8%, P = 0.105). Altogether, these data indicate reduced myogenic tone is associated with increased alpha-1 adrenergic-mediated vasoconstriction and this effect may be partially modulated by L-type calcium channels. Funding: NSERC Discovery Grant (#05323) This abstract was presented at the American Physiology Summit 2025 and is only available in HTML format. There is no downloadable file or PDF version. The Physiology editorial board was not involved in the peer review process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.348
Teacher spread0.321 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysiologySame topicNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchFrench-language works237,207