MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Work-Related Disability and Function in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE): Outcomes of an Exploratory Study from Different Canadian Centers

2025· article· en· W4411884085 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Behdin Nowrouzi‐Kia, Zahi Touma, Antonio Aviña-Zubieta, Mary Fox, W. M. Shaw, M. Ho, Qixuan Li, Catherine Ivory, Paul R. Fortin, Stephanie Keeling, Jennifer Reynolds, Derek Haaland, Janet Pope, Lily Siok Hoon Lim, Murray Urowitz, Laura Whittall Garcia, Dafna Gladman

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Rheumatology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSystemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WinnipegUniversity of ManitobaMcMaster UniversityUniversity Health NetworkUniversity of Alberta HospitalUniversity of AlbertaUniversité LavalUniversity of British ColumbiaToronto Western HospitalCentre hospitalier de l'Université LavalUniversity of OttawaArthritis Research Centre of CanadaResearch CanadaYork UniversityWestern UniversityUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineUnivariate analysisActivities of daily livingDescriptive statisticsDepression (economics)Multivariate analysisPhysical therapyGerontologyBeck Depression InventoryInternal medicinePsychiatryAnxiety

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objectives Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) has a significant and long-lasting impact on work outcomes, is a source of long-lasting work disability, and presents challenges with participation in activities of daily living. This study aimed to create a functional profile for patients with SLE. A functional profile is defined as activities of daily living and those related to work functioning (activities of daily living). Methods A cross-sectional investigation was carried out across 6 Canadian facilities, comprising 6 academic institutions and 1 community-based facility. Clinical measurements were obtained, including the SLEDAI-2K and ACR/SLICC Damage Index (SDI) and patients’ medications. Patients completed the Work Role Functioning Questionnaire v2.0 (WRFQ), the World Health Organization—Disability (WHO-DAS) Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHO-DAS), and the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II). Descriptive and inferential statistics were computed for the demographic, clinical, and functional outcomes. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses to study the association with WHO-DAS and WRF were performed. Results 404 patients were studied; mean age was 47.0±13.71 years and 91.8%% were female (64.7% White, 12.4% Black, 6.7% Chinese and 16.2% other races) with a mean SLE duration of 15.7 ±11.8 years. The total mean score for the WRFQ was 71.51.8±23.5. The WRFQ subscale mean scores were also reported for work scheduling demands (66.8±28.8), work output demands (71.1±25.6), physical demands (67.3±27.9), mental and social demands (74.4±22.8) and flexibility demands (75.0±24.7) (Figure 1). Comparison to the general working population). The WHO-DAS 2.0 total mean score was 25.1±9.71, representing approximately the 93.8th population percentile, meaning that only about 6.1% of the population scored higher (more disabled) than our sample. In the multivariate analysis, sex (Female), damage (SDI), prednisone dose, fatigue severity score, Work Role Functioning total scores, presence of fibromyalgia, Role Emotinal SF-36, depression and pain were associated with increased disability. Similarly, fatigue severity score, depression, and pain were associated with decreased WRF total scores. Conclusion This Canadian study confirmed that patients with SLE suffers from high level of disability and functional decline and as measured by WHO-DAS and WRF. Several factors were associated with disability and functional decline including accrued damage, presence of fatigue and fibromyalgia, depression, pain and prednisone dose. Developing the initial functional profile of work disability will facilitate a multidisciplinary approach to enhance the care and management of work disabilities and related functional outcomes. Supported by a CIORA grant. Best Abstract on Quality Care Initiatives in Rheumatology Award

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.067
Threshold uncertainty score0.136

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.006
Science and technology studies0.0050.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Rheumatology→Same topicSystemic Lupus Erythematosus Research→French-language works237,207→