MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411885337 · doi:10.1093/sleep/zsaf179

Ultrastructural effects of learning and post-learning sleep on the dorsal striatum

2025· article· en· W4411885337 on OpenAlexaff
Fabio Squarcio, Sophia S Loschky, Hirotaka Nagai, Giovanna Maria Spano, William Marshall, Giulio Tononi, Chiara Cirelli

Bibliographic record

VenueSLEEP · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicSleep and Wakefulness Research
Canadian institutionsBrock University
FundersNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
KeywordsNeuroscienceDendritic spineMemory consolidationSynaptic plasticitySynapseNeuroscience of sleepSleep (system call)PsychologyMotor learningStriatumSleep deprivationBiologyHippocampusMedicineSlow-wave sleepHippocampal formationCognitionInternal medicineElectroencephalography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In cortex and hippocampus, electrophysiological, molecular, and/or ultrastructural evidence shows that sleep promotes the weakening of most synapses. In primary motor cortex, immediately after training in the complex wheel task, sleep-dependent weakening spares the synapses that potentiated during learning. Together, these results show that sleep can at the same time reduce the cost of synaptic activity and promote memory consolidation. Here we used serial block-face scanning electron microcopy to measure synapse number and size of the axon-spine interface (ASI), an ultrastructural measure of synaptic strength, in the medium size spiny neurons of the mouse dorsomedial (DM) and dorsolateral (DL) striatum. Previous work found that DM is involved in the early phase of motor learning, while DL is engaged later when the task becomes automatic. Four experimental groups were used: mice extensively trained in the complex wheel task for 1 hour (T), untrained awake controls (W), and mice allowed to sleep (S) or sleep deprived (SDep) for 6 hours immediately after training (4-5 male mice/group; at least 401 ASIs/mouse/region). In DM, ASI size increases immediately after skill training in large sets of spines with high plastic potential (with endosomes and without spine apparatus) and, several hours later, the overall number of synapses decreases after sleep but not after sleep deprivation. In DL, the post-training increase in ASI size is restricted to fewer spines and is not followed by sleep-dependent synaptic changes. Thus, post-learning synaptic pruning afforded by sleep may be especially important early in the training, before the task becomes automatic. Statement of Significance Sleep promotes the consolidation of motor memories in rodents and humans, but the underlying mechanisms are poorly characterized. In dorsomedial striatum, which is involved in the early phase of learning when movements are imprecise, we find that skill training leads, in most spines, to an increase in the axon-spine interface (ASI), an ultrastructural measure of synaptic strength, and post-learning sleep, but not post-learning sleep deprivation, decreases the number of excitatory synapses. In dorsolateral striatum, which is engaged when the task becomes automatic, the post-training increase in ASI size affects fewer spines and is not followed by sleep-dependent synaptic changes. Synaptic pruning during sleep may therefore be especially important during the early phase of consolidation of a motor skill.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.173
Threshold uncertainty score0.539

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSLEEPSame topicSleep and Wakefulness ResearchFrench-language works237,207