Epigenetic silencing and genome dynamics determine the fate of giant virus endogenizations in Acanthamoeba
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Endogenized giant viruses are emerging as major contributors to the genome evolution of microbial eukaryotes, with both degraded and fully functional latent viruses being found integrated in diverse lineages. The mechanisms that determine the fate of viral integrants are poorly understood, however. Acanthamoeba is a unicellular eukaryote known for undergoing lateral gene transfer (LGT) with viruses. Here we have leveraged chromosome-scale assemblies of two strains of Acanthamoeba, Neff and C3, to investigate the genomic mechanisms that mediate the fate of viral integrations in eukaryotic genomes. RESULTS: Viral integrations in the C3 and Neff genomes are largely non-overlapping and disproportionately found in sub-telomeric regions. Multiple partial copies of these insertions are found throughout the Neff genome, but they are not expressed, do not obviously encode functions associated with their own mobility, and are colonized by host mobile elements. Viral regions are hypermethylated and highly condensed, suggesting that the expression of recently acquired viral DNA is suppressed in heterochromatic regions. CONCLUSIONS: We propose a model for the trajectory of viral sequences in Acanthamoeba: (i) integration of DNA from giant viruses, (ii) epigenetic suppression of the viral DNAs, allowing them to persist in the genome, and (iii) deterioration of viral genomes by point mutation, mobile element colonization, and intra- and inter-chromosomal recombination. Viral integrations in Acanthamoeba spp. are transient and may not have long-lasting effects on the fitness of the amoeba. Our work highlights the importance of host genome dynamics and epigenetic silencing for understanding the evolution of endogenized viral elements.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".