Lipopolysaccharide and Recombinant Prion Protein Induce Distinct Neurodegenerative Pathologies in FVB/N Mice
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Prion diseases are classically attributed to the accumulation of protease-resistant prion protein (PrPSc); however, recent evidence suggests that alternative misfolded prion conformers and systemic inflammatory factors may also contribute to neurodegeneration. This study investigated whether recombinant moPrPRes, generated by incubating wild-type mouse PrPC with bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS), can induce prion-like disease in FVB/N female mice, whether LPS alone causes neurodegeneration, and how LPS modulates disease progression in mice inoculated with the Rocky Mountain Laboratory (RML) strain of prions. Wild-type female FVB/N mice were randomized into six subcutaneous treatment groups: saline, LPS, moPrPRes, moPrPRes + LPS, RML, and RML + LPS. Animals were monitored longitudinally for survival, body weight, and clinical signs. Brain tissues were analyzed histologically and immunohistochemically for vacuolar degeneration, PrPSc accumulation, reactive astrogliosis, and amyloid-β plaque deposition. Recombinant moPrPRes induced a progressive spongiform encephalopathy characterized by widespread vacuolation and astrogliosis, yet with no detectable PrPSc by Western blot or immunohistochemistry. LPS alone triggered a distinct neurodegenerative phenotype, including cerebellar amyloid-β plaque accumulation and terminal-stage spongiosis, with approximately 40% mortality by the end of the study. Co-administration of moPrPRes and LPS resulted in variable regional pathology and intermediate survival (50% at 750 days post-inoculation). Interestingly, RML + LPS co-treatment led to earlier clinical onset and mortality compared to RML alone; however, vacuolation levels were not significantly elevated and, in some brain regions, were reduced. These results demonstrate that chronic endotoxemia and non-infectious misfolded PrP conformers can independently or synergistically induce key neuropathological hallmarks of prion disease, even in the absence of classical PrPSc. Targeting inflammatory signaling and toxic prion intermediates may offer novel therapeutic strategies for prion and prion-like disorders.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".