MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411902124 · doi:10.1186/s40644-025-00899-5

Imaging-derived biomarkers from 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT scans to predict survival of patients with neuroendocrine tumors after PRRT with 177Lu-DOTATATE

2025· article· en· W4411902124 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Imaging · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
FundersTechnische Universität Dresden
KeywordsMedicineRadionuclide therapyNeuroendocrine tumorsRadiomicsProportional hazards modelOctreotideRadiologyNuclear medicineStandardized uptake valueInternal medicineOncologyPositron emission tomographySomatostatin

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Neuroendocrine tumors have increased in prevalence and diversity in recent years and are often diagnosed at metastatic stages. Compared with nonradioactive systemic treatment with somatostatin analogs, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) has shown superior overall survival benefits for well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor patients. This study aimed to identify biomarkers from 68 Ga‒DOTATOC PET/CT scans to predict survival in patients treated with PRRT in the clinic. Methodology This retrospective study analyzed 68 Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT data from 67 NET patients undergoing PRRT. Tumor volumes and SUV metrics were segmented using standardized protocols. Radiomics features from liver metastases were extracted and preprocessed for analysis. Data were analysed via Kaplan-Meier, Cox regression, and PCA to evaluate the prognostic value of volumetric-, radiomics-, and clinicopathological parameters. Results This study included scans from 67 patients with an average age of 67 years. The mean survival time was 46.5 months, with 43% of patients alive or lost to follow-up at the conclusion of data collection. Despite comprehensive analyses, neither volumetric parameters, including total tumor volume and organ-specific tumor volume, nor SUV values (SUVmax and SUVmean) were robust predictors of overall survival. K‒M and Cox regression analyses revealed no significant differences in survival between the high- and low-risk groups for these parameters. Furthermore, radiomics features extracted from liver metastases did not demonstrate significant prognostic value. Conclusion Quantification of 68 Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT-derived parameters offers limited prognostic value for OS in NET patients who are receiving PRRT in clinical practice. These findings might emphasize the current robust integration of imaging in clinical decision-making for NET management.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it