The role and effects of the phage T4 Ac protein on infection
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The ac gene from T4 and T4-like phages is associated with susceptibility to acriflavine, an acridine that intercalates with DNA, disrupting replication and transcription. While this interference has been shown to inhibit phage replication – resulting in reduced frequency of infection and viral titer at the population level – and mutation or knockout of the ac gene renders the phage resistant to acriflavine, the role of the ac gene product, Ac, has not yet been elucidated. This study aims to further explore the role of the ac gene in phage infection by expressing it in Escherichia coli and evaluating its effects on the host under varying growth conditions and during phage infection, both in the presence and absence of acriflavine. E. coli induced to express the ac gene from phage T4 showed an increased susceptibility to acriflavine compared to the same strain not undergoing expression (non-induced) or not carrying the ac expression plasmid (empty). Moreover, in the presence of acriflavine, the parental phage T4 was not able to infect the host variants (induced, non-induced and empty), suggesting the Ac protein is involved in a potential membrane modification leading to acriflavine hindering infection. When the ac gene was deleted from the T4 phage (T4Δ ac ), the mutated phage was capable of infecting the three host variants (empty, non-induced and induced) in the presence of acriflavine, showing resistance to this acridine. Based on experimental results and protein structure prediction, we propose that the Ac protein integrates into the bacterial host cell membrane and interacts with the AcrAB-TolC efflux pump, either altering its conformation or blocking its function, thereby preventing the excretion of acriflavine which accumulates in the cell and impedes DNA replication
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".