MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Advancements in Targeted Therapies and Pharmacogenomics for Personalized Breast Cancer Treatment: The Role of Gene SNPs in Treatment Resistance.

2025· article· en· W4411927713 on OpenAlexaff
Neal M. Davies, P.S. Rajinikanth, Prashant Pandey

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicComputational Drug Discovery Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPharmacogenomicsBreast cancerMedicineSingle-nucleotide polymorphismPersonalized medicineDrug resistanceBioinformaticsCancerOncologyGeneBiologyInternal medicineGeneticsPharmacologyGenotype

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Breast cancer remains a prevalent and diverse disease, significantly contributing to cancer- related deaths among women worldwide. Recent advancements in molecular biology have paved the way for targeted therapies and pharmacogenomics, which are crucial for developing personalized treatment strategies. This literature review synthesizes findings from recent studies on these approaches, emphasizing clinical trials, genomic profiling, and personalized medicine. It aims to focus on studies examining targeted treatments, such as human epidermal growth factor receptor- 2 (HER2) inhibitors and CDK4/6 inhibitors, alongside pharmacogenomic data that influence drug metabolism, efficacy, and toxicity. Additionally, it examines the role of gene SNPs (Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms) correlated with treatment resistance, which have emerged as key biomarkers affecting therapeutic outcomes in breast cancer. These SNPs, found in genes involved in drug metabolism and tumor progression, contribute to variability in treatment responses and resistance in specific subtypes. They encompass various breast cancer subtypes, including hormone receptorpositive (HR+), HER2-positive, and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). The targeted therapies, particularly HER2 inhibitors, have markedly improved outcomes for specific subtypes. Furthermore, pharmacogenomics personalizes treatment by identifying genetic variations that affect drug response, optimizing therapy selection, and minimizing adverse effects. Despite these advancements, drug resistance remains a significant challenge, highlighting the necessity for ongoing research in molecular diagnostics and innovative therapeutic combinations. The literature suggests that precision medicine, driven by genomic profiling, pharmacogenomic data, and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) analysis, is enhancing treatment efficacy for breast cancer patients. HER2- positive and HR+ patients have especially benefitted from these targeted therapies while emerging treatments are addressing the complexities of TNBC. Additionally, genetic testing, such as BRCA1/2 mutation screening, is vital for guiding treatment decisions. Targeted therapies and pharmacogenomics have revolutionized breast cancer treatment, providing more personalized and effective care. Nevertheless, overcoming drug resistance and expanding access to genomic testing are essential for future advancements in this field.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.961
Threshold uncertainty score0.371

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMedSame topicComputational Drug Discovery MethodsFrench-language works237,207