MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411931815 · doi:10.1007/s00220-025-05344-z

Bosonization and Anomaly Indicators of (2+1)-D Fermionic Topological Orders

2025· article· en· W4411931815 on OpenAlexaff
Arun Debray, Weicheng Ye, Matthew Yu

Bibliographic record

VenueCommunications in Mathematical Physics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicTopological Materials and Phenomena
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBosonizationAnomaly (physics)Complex systemPhysicsMathematical physicsTheoretical physicsFermionTopology (electrical circuits)MathematicsQuantum mechanicsComputer scienceCombinatoricsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We provide a mathematical proposal for the anomaly indicators of symmetries of (2+1)-D fermionic topological orders, and work out the consequences of our proposal in several nontrivial examples. Our proposal is an invariant of a super modular tensor category with a fermionic group action, which gives a (3+1)-D topological field theory (TFT) that we conjecture to be invertible; the anomaly indicators are partition functions of this TFT on 4-manifolds generating the corresponding twisted spin bordism group. Our construction relies on a bosonization construction due to Gaiotto–Kapustin and Tata–Kobayashi–Bulmash–Barkeshli, together with a “bosonization conjecture” which we explain in detail. In the second half of the paper, we discuss several examples of our invariants relevant to condensed-matter physics. The most important example we consider is $$\mathbb {Z}/4^T\times \mathbb {Z}/2^f$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>Z</mml:mi> <mml:mo>/</mml:mo> <mml:msup> <mml:mn>4</mml:mn> <mml:mi>T</mml:mi> </mml:msup> <mml:mo>×</mml:mo> <mml:mi>Z</mml:mi> <mml:mo>/</mml:mo> <mml:msup> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> <mml:mi>f</mml:mi> </mml:msup> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> time-reversal symmetry with symmetry algebra $${\mathcal {T}}^2 = (-1)^FC$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msup> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>T</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> </mml:msup> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:msup> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>(</mml:mo> <mml:mo>-</mml:mo> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> <mml:mo>)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> <mml:mi>F</mml:mi> </mml:msup> <mml:mi>C</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> , which many fermionic topological orders enjoy, including the $$\textrm{U}(1)_5$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mtext>U</mml:mtext> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>(</mml:mo> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> <mml:mo>)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> <mml:mn>5</mml:mn> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> spin Chern–Simons theory. Using newly developed tools involving the Smith long exact sequence, we calculate the cobordism group that classifies its anomaly, present the generating manifold, and calculate the partition function on the generating manifold which serves as our anomaly indicator. Our approach allows us to reproduce anomaly indicators known in the literature with simpler proofs, including $$\mathbb {Z}/4^{Tf}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>Z</mml:mi> <mml:mo>/</mml:mo> <mml:msup> <mml:mn>4</mml:mn> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>Tf</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:msup> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> time-reversal symmetry with symmetry algebra $$\mathcal T^2 = (-1)^F$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msup> <mml:mi>T</mml:mi> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> </mml:msup> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:msup> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>(</mml:mo> <mml:mo>-</mml:mo> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> <mml:mo>)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> <mml:mi>F</mml:mi> </mml:msup> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> , and other symmetry groups in the 10-fold way involving Lie group symmetries.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.084
Threshold uncertainty score0.317

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCommunications in Mathematical PhysicsSame topicTopological Materials and PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207