MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411934395 · doi:10.1212/nxg.0000000000200275

Diagnostic Accuracy of Clinical Manifestations in Identifying People With Tuberous Sclerosis Complex

2025· article· en· W4411934395 on OpenAlexaff
Jimmy Li, Zaki El Haffaf, Jean‐Baptiste Lattouf, Philippe Major, Mark R. Keezer

Bibliographic record

VenueNeurology Genetics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTuberous Sclerosis Complex Research
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-JustineCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de MontréalUniversité de MontréalCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de SherbrookeUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTuberous sclerosisMedicineDermatologyRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background and Objectives: and are diagnosed clinically. In such situations, family members cannot be screened using genetic testing. We aimed to establish the diagnostic accuracy of TSC clinical features to better guide the screening process for the families of PwTSC. Methods: We used the TSC Natural History Database, a longitudinal database of PwTSC from 22 North American centers. We used a definite genetic TSC diagnosis as our gold standard. We estimated the sensitivity (95% CI) of TSC-related skin, structural brain, renal, and cardiac manifestations, as well as combinations of these manifestations. Using a series of sensitivity analyses to test alternate assumptions, we estimated positive predictive values and negative predictive values (PPVs and NPVs). Results: Among the 1,300 genetics-positive PwTSC, 50.3% were female and the mean age at diagnosis was 3.7 years. The sensitivity of at least one skin or structural brain manifestation was 98.7% (95% CI 98.0-99.2). The PPV and NPV were 83.2 (95% CI 81.6-84.6) and 98.4% (95% CI 97.8-98.8), respectively, while assuming 50% prevalence and 80% specificity. Including cardiac manifestations marginally increased the sensitivity, PPV, and NPV to 99.5% (95% CI 98.9-99.7), 83.3% (95% CI 81.8-84.7), and 99.4% (95% CI 99.0-99.6), respectively. Other combinations of TSC manifestations had lower or similar diagnostic accuracy. Discussion: Assessment of brain and skin manifestations in family members of genetics-positive PwTSC is sufficient to screen for TSC in most cases, with excellent sensitivity and NPV. Our findings are potentially applicable to family members of genetics-negative PwTSC. Further cardiac screening may optimize diagnostic accuracy in selected cases. Classification of Evidence: This study provides Class IV evidence that a combination of brain and skin manifestations is highly sensitive for diagnosing TSC in family members of patients with genetically confirmed TSC.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.057
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.054

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.057
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.158
GPT teacher head0.421
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeurology GeneticsSame topicTuberous Sclerosis Complex ResearchFrench-language works237,207