MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411934395 · doi:10.1212/nxg.0000000000200275

Diagnostic Accuracy of Clinical Manifestations in Identifying People With Tuberous Sclerosis Complex

2025· article· en· W4411934395 on OpenAlex
Jimmy Li, Zaki El Haffaf, Jean‐Baptiste Lattouf, Philippe Major, Mark R. Keezer

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueNeurology Genetics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTuberous Sclerosis Complex Research
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-JustineCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de MontréalUniversité de MontréalCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de SherbrookeUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTuberous sclerosisMedicineDermatologyRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background and Objectives: and are diagnosed clinically. In such situations, family members cannot be screened using genetic testing. We aimed to establish the diagnostic accuracy of TSC clinical features to better guide the screening process for the families of PwTSC. Methods: We used the TSC Natural History Database, a longitudinal database of PwTSC from 22 North American centers. We used a definite genetic TSC diagnosis as our gold standard. We estimated the sensitivity (95% CI) of TSC-related skin, structural brain, renal, and cardiac manifestations, as well as combinations of these manifestations. Using a series of sensitivity analyses to test alternate assumptions, we estimated positive predictive values and negative predictive values (PPVs and NPVs). Results: Among the 1,300 genetics-positive PwTSC, 50.3% were female and the mean age at diagnosis was 3.7 years. The sensitivity of at least one skin or structural brain manifestation was 98.7% (95% CI 98.0-99.2). The PPV and NPV were 83.2 (95% CI 81.6-84.6) and 98.4% (95% CI 97.8-98.8), respectively, while assuming 50% prevalence and 80% specificity. Including cardiac manifestations marginally increased the sensitivity, PPV, and NPV to 99.5% (95% CI 98.9-99.7), 83.3% (95% CI 81.8-84.7), and 99.4% (95% CI 99.0-99.6), respectively. Other combinations of TSC manifestations had lower or similar diagnostic accuracy. Discussion: Assessment of brain and skin manifestations in family members of genetics-positive PwTSC is sufficient to screen for TSC in most cases, with excellent sensitivity and NPV. Our findings are potentially applicable to family members of genetics-negative PwTSC. Further cardiac screening may optimize diagnostic accuracy in selected cases. Classification of Evidence: This study provides Class IV evidence that a combination of brain and skin manifestations is highly sensitive for diagnosing TSC in family members of patients with genetically confirmed TSC.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.623

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.158
GPT teacher head0.421
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it