Exploring the Boundaries of On-Device Inference: When Tiny Falls Short, Go Hierarchical
Bibliographic record
Abstract
On-device inference offers significant benefits in edge ML systems, such as improved energy efficiency, responsiveness, and privacy, compared to traditional centralized approaches. However, the resource constraints of embedded devices limit their use to simple inference tasks, creating a trade-off between efficiency and capability. In this context, the Hierarchical Inference (HI) system has emerged as a promising solution that augments the capabilities of the local ML by offloading selected samples to an edge server/cloud for remote ML inference. Existing works, primarily based on simulations, demonstrate that HI improves accuracy. However, they fail to account for the latency and energy consumption in real-world deployments, nor do they consider three key heterogeneous components that characterize ML-enabled IoT systems: hardware, network connectivity, and models. To bridge this gap, this paper systematically evaluates HI against standalone on-device inference by analyzing accuracy, latency, and energy trade-offs across five devices and three image classification datasets. Our findings show that, for a given accuracy requirement, the HI approach we designed achieved up to 73% lower latency and up to 77% lower device energy consumption than an on-device inference system. Despite these gains, HI introduces a fixed energy and latency overhead from on-device inference for all samples. To address this, we propose a hybrid system called Early Exit with HI (EE-HI) and demonstrate that, compared to HI, EE-HI reduces the latency up to 59.7% and lowers the device’s energy consumption up to 60.4%. These findings demonstrate the potential of HI and EE-HI to enable more efficient ML in IoT systems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.020 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".