MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411953472 · doi:10.18103/mra.v13i6.6536

Improving the Psychosocial Assessment of Young People with ADHD: Clinical and Ethical Issues from the Quebec Experience (I)

2025· article· en· W4411953472 on OpenAlex
Joël Monzée, Anne-Isabelle Dionne

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueMedical Research Archives · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAttention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
Canadian institutionsCentre de Développement du Porc du Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychosocialPsychologyEthical issuesClinical psychologyDevelopmental psychologyMedicinePsychiatryEngineering ethicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder is a neurodevelopmental disorder that is often diagnosed in childhood and can persist into adulthood. This disorder is characterized by inattention, hyperactivity, and impulsivity that significantly interfere with daily functioning. In Quebec, there is a problem of overdiagnosis and overprescription of psychostimulants compared to the usual global statistics. In fact, the diagnosis of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder is normally based on a detailed clinical assessment, including analysis of medical, family, and environmental history, as well as the use of validated rating scales and structured clinical interviews that understand their limitations. However, the differential diagnosis is challenging due to the presence of various comorbidities, such as mood disorders, anxiety disorders, sleep disorders, and learning disabilities. In addition, some modern environmental factors, such as excessive screen exposure, have been associated with symptoms of inattention, agitation, and impulsivity in children. Since secure attachment relationships play a crucial role in a child's development, things like family instability, high parental stress, lack of emotional availability, or inconsistent parenting practices can weaken attachment and lead to “Attention-Deficit-Hyperactivity-Disorder-Like” behaviors. Beyond the clinical issues, it is also an ethical concern to ensure that the therapeutic direction is optimized for the benefit of the patient. This article examines the issues related to the diagnostic process by emphasizing the importance of a comprehensive and integrative assessment that considers environmental and relational factors. Such an approach makes it possible to better distinguish attention deficit hyperactivity disorder from other pathologies and to develop appropriate therapeutic strategies, ranging from conventional pharmacological treatments to interventions focused on managing exposure to screens and strengthening secure attachment bonds. This comprehensive diagnostic framework offers large potential to improve patient care and optimize long-term clinical outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Science and technology studies, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.141
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.004
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.086
GPT teacher head0.519
Teacher spread0.433 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it