MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411954753 · doi:10.26685/urncst.799

How Does the Gut Microbiome Contribute to Diabetes Development: A Literature Review

2025· review· en· W4411954753 on OpenAlexaff
N. Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueUndergraduate Research in Natural and Clinical Science and Technology (URNCST) Journal · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiet and metabolism studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicrobiomeGut microbiomeDiabetes mellitusBiologyMedicineBioinformaticsEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Type 2 diabetes mellitus affects over 6% of the world population and is strongly linked to obesity. Traditional views have attributed obesity to sedentary lifestyles and high-fat diets but emerging evidence implicates gut microbiome dysbiosis as a pivotal factor in type 2 diabetes mellitus onset. High fat diets can impair microbiome health, leading to dysbiosis that triggers metabolic deregulation, insulin resistance, and inflammation. The purpose of this review is to elucidate how alterations in the gut microbiota contribute to type 2 diabetes mellitus development, with a focus on obesity, insulin resistance, and inflammatory pathways. Methods: We conducted a comprehensive review of the literature, integrating findings from clinical trials, preclinical studies, and systematic reviews. Our analysis focused on interventions targeting the gut microbiota, including direct supplementation with short-chain fatty acids such as butyrate, probiotic treatments, and fecal microbiota transplantation. Additionally, we examined dietary strategies to boost butyrate production via increased fiber intake. Results: Findings across studies consistently reveal a reduction in butyrate producing bacteria correlates with type 2 diabetes mellitus and metabolic dysregulation. Clinical trials have demonstrated that probiotic interventions, such as the daily consumption of probiotic yogurt, significantly lower fasting blood glucose while enhancing antioxidant defenses. Preclinical research in high fat diet induced obese mice revealed that butyrate supplementation preserves insulin sensitivity, promotes mitochondrial function, and enhances adaptive thermogenesis. Furthermore, specific microbial taxa such as Akkermansia muciniphila exert protective effects. Discussion: These findings suggest that gut microbiota modulate host metabolism via key signaling pathways. The interactions between dietary factors, microbial composition, and host inflammatory responses highlights the potential for microbiome targeted therapies in type 2 diabetes mellitus management. Conclusion: Gut targeted interventions including probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics, and fecal microbiota transplantation hold promise for improving glycemic control and mitigating insulin resistance. Future research should focus on optimizing these strategies to restore microbial balance, reducing obesity related metabolic derangements and improved long term outcomes in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.003
Bibliometrics0.0070.007
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.439
Teacher spread0.384 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUndergraduate Research in Natural and Clinical Science and Technology (URNCST) JournalSame topicDiet and metabolism studiesFrench-language works237,207