MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411959270 · doi:10.1002/pan3.70090

Empirical research review on Solastalgia: Place, people and policy pathways for addressing environmental distress

2025· article· en· W4411959270 on OpenAlexaff
Nazifa Rafa, Aiora Zabala, Lindsay P. Galway

Bibliographic record

VenuePeople and Nature · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicUrban Transport and Accessibility
Canadian institutionsLakehead University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDistressPsychologyEmpirical researchEnvironmental planningPsychotherapistEnvironmental scienceEpistemology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The growing impacts of climate change and environmental degradation have heightened concerns about human emotional and psychological well‐being, particularly regarding place loss and environmental changes. Solastalgia, defined as distress from environmental change while in one's ‘home’ environment, is an emerging concept for assessing loss and damage, influencing environmental evaluations, shaping legal cases and safeguarding health and well‐being. As solastalgia gains traction in academic, policy and practical work, understanding its conceptualization and measurement becomes paramount and timely. This scoping review examines 20 years of scholarly empirical literature on solastalgia, exploring its conceptualization and measurement, environmental triggers, susceptibility factors and responses of those affected and recommendations made by the studies. Studies primarily focus on environmental changes like climate change, urbanization and mining as key solastalgia triggers, with rural and coastal areas being the most frequently studied. Recent literature also expands its application to reflect its broader socio‐ecological relevance. Methodological trends show a growing increase in quantitative studies, with scales such as the Environmental Distress Scale and the Solastalgia Scale increasingly used alongside qualitative research. However, measurement inconsistencies persist, highlighting a need for refined assessment tools. Certain groups, including women, ethnic minorities, lower‐income populations and Indigenous communities, have been reported to be disproportionately susceptible to solastalgia due to heightened place attachment and systemic vulnerabilities. Slow‐onset environmental changes tend to result in prolonged distress compared to acute events. Adaptive strategies, ranging from community resilience‐building to political mobilization, have been key responses. Emotional responses vary widely across contexts, from grief and withdrawal to participating in activism and place‐based restoration efforts. Integrating solastalgia into mental health programmes, environmental impact assessments and community resilience planning is essential for mitigating its psychological effects. Policymakers and practitioners must recognize solastalgia as a critical component in climate adaptation strategies, promoting community‐driven approaches as well as individual resilience‐building initiatives to address environmental distress. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.059
Threshold uncertainty score0.725

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.410
Teacher spread0.353 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePeople and NatureSame topicUrban Transport and AccessibilityFrench-language works237,207