Biologic Footprint Reconstruction: Rotator Cuff Repair Using Biologic Tuberoplasty
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Irreparable rotator cuff tears present significant challenges owing to tear size, tendon retraction, and poor tissue quality. This article describes a surgical approach integrating biologic tuberoplasty with rotator cuff repair, using an acellular human dermal allograft to re-establish the rotator cuff footprint and prevent bone-on-bone contact between the humeral head and acromion. Footprint reconstruction is defined as allograft coverage of the tuberosity combined with partial cuff repair that includes some contact of the native cuff over the allograft. Changing the nomenclature to "biologic footprint reconstruction" more accurately describes the procedure when combined with partial cuff repair in continuity with the allograft and avoids confusion with isolated biologic tuberoplasty. The graft alleviates pain and creates a biologic healing environment. This approach is designed to reduce surgical complexity and improve efficiency, ensuring reproducibility while restoring shoulder biomechanics and function.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".