Resiliency of the Comprehensive School Health Approach in Canadian Schools Throughout the <scp>COVID</scp>‐19 Pandemic
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Comprehensive School Health (CSH) is a whole school approach to promote healthy school communities. The objective of this study was to understand if and how schools that take a CSH approach (i.e., APPLE Schools) sustained and adapted their efforts during the COVID-19 pandemic. CONTRIBUTIONS TO PRACTICE: This qualitative study highlighted teaching staff and principals' perspectives to showcase the ways that health and wellbeing supports through the CSH approach helped to mitigate the COVID-19 impacts on schools. This article describes three themes that exemplified how healthy school communities were promoted and maintained during the COVID-19 pandemic: wellness was already a priority, purposeful efforts to continue health promotion, and recognition that (a culture of) wellness extends beyond the school. IMPLICATIONS FOR SCHOOL HEALTH POLICY, PRACTICE, AND EQUITY: CSH approaches with supportive environments, healthy living practices, partnerships, and overarching district policies offer a structure and pathway to guide efforts in schools during times of adversity and support whole school communities. The CSH approach had a beneficial impact in urban, rural, and remote school contexts. CONCLUSIONS: Schools with well-established priorities of wellness carried CSH practices throughout the pandemic. This ensured student and staff wellness was at the forefront of health promoting efforts.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.009 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".