All-alumina quarter-wave plate coatings fabricated by glancing angle deposition using serial bideposition
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Anisotropic phase retarders, used in high power laser facilities to perform polarization smoothing, can be obtained by the glancing angle deposition (GLAD) coating process. Due to its high laser resistance, the coatings are mainly made of silica. Therefore, limited attention has been given to other dielectric materials. Here we present a study on alumina GLAD anisotropic coatings; a material with high laser resistance, higher birefringence and lower environmental sensitivity than silica. Since the anisotropy is related to the coatings microstructure through the deposition angle, samples were coated at angles varying from ± 68° to ± 82° using the serial bideposition technique. They were characterized by ellipsometry, polarimetry, spectrophotometry and electron microscopy. We showed that the highest birefringence is obtained at a deposition angle of ± 76° with an in-plane value of 0.053. Based on these results, a quarter-wave plate at 351 nm was designed as a multilayer with seven pairs of anisotropic layers deposited at ± 76° and isotropic layers deposited at 0°. The fabricated coating exhibited a uniform retardance of 88.51 ± 0.45 nm. The alumina GLAD wave plates presented here, open the door to new possibilities in the laser field and especially in the field of fusion energy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".