MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411968909 · doi:10.3389/fmed.2025.1602274

Bridging tradition and innovation: a constitution-guided framework for personalized blood pressure management in acute ischemic stroke

2025· article· en· W4411968909 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Xuran Zhang, Kegang Cao, Li Zhou, Jinxian Liu, Yufeng Ding

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Medicine · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTraditional Chinese Medicine Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCochrane LibraryPublication biasTraditional Chinese medicineStroke (engine)Meta-analysisIntensive care medicineInternal medicineAlternative medicinePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Elevated blood pressure (BP) in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) significantly impacts clinical outcomes, yet optimal BP management remains contentious due to patient heterogeneity. Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) constitution theory categorizes individuals into distinct physiological patterns, offering a novel framework to address this variability. This study integrates TCM constitutional theory into modern AIS care to propose a personalized BP management ‌hypothesis. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted across nine databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, the Cochrane Library, ScienceDirect, the Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Data, VIP Database, and China Biology Medicine, covering publications up to January 2025. We analyzed TCM constitution distributions in AIS, hypertension, hypotension, AIS with hypertension, ischemic stroke (IS) with hypertension, and ischemic cerebrovascular disease with hypoperfusion, correlating constitutional types with clinical outcomes. We employed the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) checklist to evaluate the methodological quality of cross-sectional studies and utilized the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for quality assessment of cohort and case-control studies. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were performed, and publication bias was assessed. A constitution-guided framework for BP management was developed through evidence synthesis. Results: Fifty-four studies were included in the study, with the majority being of moderate-to-high quality. The findings demonstrated that Phlegm-dampness, Qi-deficiency, Yin-deficiency, and Blood-stasis constitutions predominated in AIS patients with hypertension. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the results. Most analyses demonstrated no evidence of publication bias. Although several analyses indicated potential publication bias, the primary conclusions withstood the trim-and-fill adjustment and remained robust. A TCM constitution-based BP management hypothesis was proposed: patients with Phlegm-dampness or Blood-stasis constitutions may benefit from intensive BP control, whereas Qi-deficiency and Yin-deficiency types may require conservative strategies to mitigate hypoperfusion risks. Conclusion: This integration of TCM constitutional theory into AIS BP management provides a potential framework for advancing precision care to improve clinical outcomes in AIS patients. Further validation in multicenter cohorts and mechanistic exploration is warranted to enhance clinical applicability (Registration information: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO2/view/CRD420250655689).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.627
Threshold uncertainty score0.789

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in MedicineSame topicTraditional Chinese Medicine StudiesFrench-language works237,207