Bridging tradition and innovation: a constitution-guided framework for personalized blood pressure management in acute ischemic stroke
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Elevated blood pressure (BP) in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) significantly impacts clinical outcomes, yet optimal BP management remains contentious due to patient heterogeneity. Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) constitution theory categorizes individuals into distinct physiological patterns, offering a novel framework to address this variability. This study integrates TCM constitutional theory into modern AIS care to propose a personalized BP management hypothesis. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted across nine databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, the Cochrane Library, ScienceDirect, the Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Data, VIP Database, and China Biology Medicine, covering publications up to January 2025. We analyzed TCM constitution distributions in AIS, hypertension, hypotension, AIS with hypertension, ischemic stroke (IS) with hypertension, and ischemic cerebrovascular disease with hypoperfusion, correlating constitutional types with clinical outcomes. We employed the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) checklist to evaluate the methodological quality of cross-sectional studies and utilized the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for quality assessment of cohort and case-control studies. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were performed, and publication bias was assessed. A constitution-guided framework for BP management was developed through evidence synthesis. Results: Fifty-four studies were included in the study, with the majority being of moderate-to-high quality. The findings demonstrated that Phlegm-dampness, Qi-deficiency, Yin-deficiency, and Blood-stasis constitutions predominated in AIS patients with hypertension. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the results. Most analyses demonstrated no evidence of publication bias. Although several analyses indicated potential publication bias, the primary conclusions withstood the trim-and-fill adjustment and remained robust. A TCM constitution-based BP management hypothesis was proposed: patients with Phlegm-dampness or Blood-stasis constitutions may benefit from intensive BP control, whereas Qi-deficiency and Yin-deficiency types may require conservative strategies to mitigate hypoperfusion risks. Conclusion: This integration of TCM constitutional theory into AIS BP management provides a potential framework for advancing precision care to improve clinical outcomes in AIS patients. Further validation in multicenter cohorts and mechanistic exploration is warranted to enhance clinical applicability (Registration information: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO2/view/CRD420250655689).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.029 | 0.039 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.010 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".