Cloud point pressure estimation of gas-soluble chemicals in carbon dioxide by machine learning paradigms
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The CO2-based enhanced oil recovery operations not only increase the recovery factor but can result in reducing the amount of CO2 released into the atmosphere. It is possible to improve the effectiveness of CO2 injection into the reservoir by incorporating gas-soluble chemicals. Since the experimental measurement of the dissolution pressure of chemicals in CO2 [i.e., cloud point pressure (CPP)] is costly and time-consuming, it is necessary to develop a model for its reliable estimation. Although some thermodynamic-based correlations are proposed to estimate the cloud point pressure (CPP), their inaccuracy and limited ranges of application are challenging. Consequently, this study utilizes artificial neural networks, least-squares support vector regression, and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference systems to accurately anticipate the CPP value as a function of chemical type, chemical concentration, and temperature. Both the correlation matrix analysis and standardized coefficient proved that the CPP increases by all these explanatory features so that the chemical concentration is the most important variable. Tuning the models' hyperparameters and monitoring their accuracy in the cross-validation and testing stages confirm that the general regression neural network is the most accurate paradigm for estimating the CPP value. This model anticipates 381 literature records with a mean absolute error of 8.09, an absolute average relative deviation percent of 3.27%, and a regression coefficient of 0.974 21. This straightforward machine learning paradigm not only broadens our understanding of the chemical dissolution in CO2 but also helps appropriately design the CO2-based enhanced oil recovery scenarios.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".