MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411991406 · doi:10.1016/j.ebr.2025.100802

Brain tumours as an unrecognized etiology of infantile epileptic spasms syndrome (IESS): The role of resective epilepsy surgery

2025· article· en· W4411991406 on OpenAlexaff
Kevin Jones, Ronit Mesterman, Rajesh RamachandranNair, Hiroshi Otsubo, Ivanna Yau, Elizabeth Donner, George M. Ibrahim, Puneet Jain, Robyn Whitney

Bibliographic record

VenueEpilepsy & Behavior Reports · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEpilepsy research and treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEtiologyEpilepsyMedicineEpilepsy surgeryWest SyndromeEpileptic spasmsPediatricsSurgeryPathologyPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Brain tumours are a rare cause of infantile epileptic spasm syndrome (IESS). Epilepsy surgery may be utilized in refractory IESS due to tumours, although reports are limited. We report an illustrative case of IESS which resolved after tumour resection and performed a literature review of all reported cases of brain tumours causing IESS with hypsarrhythmia. We present a 10-month-old girl with drug-resistant symmetric epileptic spasms (ES). Initial EEG showed symmetric hypsarrhythmia and brain MRI demonstrated a left temporal lobe tumour. Despite non-focal clinical and EEG findings, she underwent tumour resection at 21 months (ganglioglioma). She subsequently had resolution of ES and hypsarrhythmia and developmental gains. Twenty-seven published cases of brain tumours and IESS were reviewed. ES were refractory to medical management in 74 % of reported cases (17/23). ES were symmetric in 17/21 (81 %) and asymmetric in 4/21 (19 %) specified cases. Hypsarrhythmia pattern was asymmetric in 10/20 (50 %) specified cases. Of 21 surviving patients who underwent surgery, 13 (62 %) were seizure free at follow-up and only 1 (5 %) had no improvement. Developmental outcomes were available in 19/21 (90 %) surviving surgical patients and 10/19 had improvements (52 %); 6/19 had normalized development (32 %). Various tumour types were reported and a temporal or frontal location was most common. Brain tumours can cause IESS with or without clinical or EEG focality and are amenable to surgical treatment. We emphasize that the absence of focal signs should not delay surgical assessment for patients with refractory IESS and brain tumours.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEpilepsy & Behavior ReportsSame topicEpilepsy research and treatmentFrench-language works237,207