Marstacimab prophylaxis in hemophilia A/B without inhibitors: results from the phase 3 BASIS trial
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT: Marstacimab targets the tissue factor pathway inhibitor to rebalance hemostasis. Previous phase 1 and 2 trials established marstacimab safety and efficacy in adults with severe hemophilia A (HA) or B (HB). BASIS is an open-label, marstacimab phase 3 trial in males aged 12 to 74 years with severe HA (factor VIII <1%) or moderately severe to severe HB (factor IX ≤2%). Participants without inhibitors received on-demand (OD) or routine prophylaxis (RP) therapy during a 6-month observational phase (OP) before receiving once-weekly subcutaneous 150 mg marstacimab during a 12-month active treatment phase (ATP). Primary end points were annualized bleeding rate (ABR) for treated bleeds vs previous OD or RP during the OP, and safety. Of 128 participants enrolled in the OP, 116 received marstacimab in the ATP. In the OD group (n = 33), mean ABR decreased from 39.86 (95% confidence interval [CI], 33.05-48.07) in the OP to 3.20 (95% CI, 2.10-4.88) in the ATP, demonstrating superiority of marstacimab (estimated ABR ratio, 0.080 [95% CI, 0.057-0.113]; P < .0001). In the RP group (n = 83), mean ABR decreased from 7.90 (95% CI, 5.14-10.66) in the OP to 5.09 (95% CI, 3.40-6.78) in the ATP, demonstrating noninferiority and superiority of marstacimab (estimated ABR difference, -2.81 [95% CI, -5.42 to -0.20]; P = .0349). There were no deaths or thromboembolic events. Weekly subcutaneous marstacimab reduced ABR vs OD or RP therapy in the OP in individuals with severe HA or moderately severe to severe HB without inhibitors. Marstacimab was safe and well tolerated with no unanticipated side effects. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03938792.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".