MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412005418 · doi:10.26685/urncst.886

Advances in Nanotechnology for Diagnosis, Treatment, and Recovery of Bone Cancer

2025· article· en· W4412005418 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueUndergraduate Research in Natural and Clinical Science and Technology (URNCST) Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNanoplatforms for cancer theranostics
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNanotechnologyMedicineCancerMaterials scienceInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Although effective treatments for bone cancer currently exist, nanotechnology promises to improve the diagnosis, treatment, and recovery from this disease. This paper explores the various ways in which nanotechnology is being explored in relation to the imaging of tumours, the delivery of treatments, and the rebuilding of bones. Methods: Using computer aided searches, studies from across the globe that highlighted the development of nanotechnology for application in treating bone cancers were located. A total of ten articles were selected for inclusion in this paper because they represent a broad array of nanotechnology applications related to primary and secondary bone cancer. Results: The results of this research indicate that nanotechnology can be used to detect cancer by identifying tumour biomarkers by amplifying Raman signals, transmitting light wave signals, and by attaching fluorescent nanomaterials. Other studies found that nanomaterials can cause apoptosis of cancer cells while promoting healing in other non-cancerous cells. It has also been found that nanomaterials can deliver mRNA and small interfering RNA treatment directly to the tumour site. Nanomaterials have also been found to be useful as photothermal agents. Not only can nanomaterials be used to stimulate bone regeneration, researchers have also found that it can also be used to create scaffolds which mimic the extracellular matrix of natural bone. Discussion: Although nanotechnology holds great promise, it also presents several potential dangers. Researchers have found that nanoparticles can be inhaled and may do damage to the lungs. In addition, some researchers note that the introduction of nanomaterials may cause an increase in radical oxygen species which can also harm humans and other species. Therefore, more research is needed to find ways to lessen the impact of these potential harmful aspects of nanomaterials. Conclusion: Nanotechnology is a relatively new field that has the potential to improve the ways to diagnose and treat bone cancers. However, it is imperative to continue to research the more harmful aspects of nanotechnology so steps may be taken to reduce the risk while increasing the benefits.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.400
Teacher spread0.367 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUndergraduate Research in Natural and Clinical Science and Technology (URNCST) JournalSame topicNanoplatforms for cancer theranosticsFrench-language works237,207