The Effect of Wilbarger Protocol and Oral Tactile Technique Intervention on Sensory Processing and Occupational Performance : A Case Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
목적 : 감각조절장애 아동 3명에게 Wilbarger protocol과 Oral Tactile Technique(OTT)을 적용한 후 감 각처리와 작업수행의 변화를 알아보았다. 연구방법 : 서울시 소재의 B복지관에서 2024년 8월에 실시한 “감각방어집중치료”프로그램에 참여한 5-8세 아동 3명을 대상으로 치료사와 보호자가 Wilbarger protocol과 OTT를 2주 동안 집중 적용하였다. 적용 전과 후에 단축형 감각 프로파일, 감각력 면담, Canadian Occupational Performance Measure(COPM) 을 측정하여 감각처리와 작업수행의 변화를 확인하였다. 결과 : A아동은 단축형 감각 프로파일의 청각 여과하기, B아동은 움직임 민감성, 시각/청각 민감성, C아동 은 촉각 민감성, 청각 여과하기, 시각/청각 민감성 영역에서 치료 이후 긍정적인 변화를 보였다. 모든 아 동의 COPM의 수행도 점수가 치료 이후 향상되었다. 결론 : 감각조절장애 아동 3명에게 Wilbarger protocol과 OTT의 적용은 감각처리 어려움의 증상과 작업 수행에 긍정적인 영향을 미치는 것으로 보인다.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".