MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412016647 · doi:10.58962/hsr.2025.11.2.35-49

Associations between assessments of core stability components: gender implication

2025· article· en· W4412016647 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ebby Waqqash Mohamad Chan, Mohamad Shariff A. Hamid, Eliza Hafiz, Ali Md Nadzalan, Ratko Pavlović, Victor Selvarajah Selvanayagam

Bibliographic record

VenueHealth sport rehabilitation · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicOccupational Health and Performance
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
KeywordsCore (optical fiber)Stability (learning theory)PsychologyCore stabilityMedicineComputer sciencePhysical medicine and rehabilitationMachine learningTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background and purpose The fundamental elements of core stability (CS) encompass the regulation of the lumbopelvic region, the endurance of the trunk, and the maintenance of balance. Assessments of these components have produced mixed results and this could be attributed to gender differences. This study aims to evaluate the relationships between core stability components and the associations between their assessments through gender-specific analyses. Material and methods A total of forty collegiate students, consisting of twenty males and twenty females, were selected as participants for this cross-sectional study. The mean age of the participants was 21.4 ± 1.92 years, with an average weight of 58.72 ± 10.96kg and height of 1.63 ± 0.09m. The assessment of participants' lumbopelvic control was conducted with the Sahrmann 5-level core stability test (S5CST), while their trunk endurance was evaluated by the implementation of the McGill and Ito protocols, specifically targeting trunk flexor (TF), trunk extensor (TE), and side plank (SP) exercises. The Stork test was employed to assess static balance, while the Y-balance test was utilized to evaluate dynamic balance. Results A correlation study was conducted on a sample of 40 people, which demonstrated a significant positive association (p < 0.01) between the S5CST and Stork balance for both the dominant leg (Rho = 0.62) and the non-dominant leg (Rho = 0.56). Additionally, a positive relationship was found between the S5CST and non-dominant leg Y-balance (Rho = 0.38), as well as Ito TF (Rho = 0.33). There were no statistically significant associations found between trunk endurance and balance. Gender comparison revealed that females outperformed males in TF (Ito and McGill protocols) and TE (McGill protocol) (p ≤ 0.05). Furthermore, females’ S5CST had greater association than males in non-dominant leg Y-balance for anterior (Z = -2.58, p = 0.009) and posteromedial directions (Z = -1.98, p = 0.046). Conclusions To conclude, lumbopelvic control is a better predictor of proximal-distal core stability than trunk endurance, and trunk neuromuscular pattern differs between genders.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.679

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.182
GPT teacher head0.538
Teacher spread0.356 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHealth sport rehabilitationSame topicOccupational Health and PerformanceFrench-language works237,207