MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412020048 · doi:10.1177/15385744251355230

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Effect of Chronic Kidney Disease on Amputation and Mortality in Patients With Peripheral Artery Disease

2025· review· en· W4412020048 on OpenAlex
Yahui Zhang, Yuan Liao, Hongbao Guo

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueVascular and Endovascular Surgery · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPeripheral Artery Disease Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAmputationMeta-analysisKidney diseaseCochrane LibraryInternal medicineSubgroup analysisObservational studyRelative riskMEDLINECritical limb ischemiaRevascularizationConfidence intervalArterial diseaseSurgeryVascular diseaseMyocardial infarction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background The influence of presence/absence chronic kidney disease (CKD) on the clinical course and outcomes of patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) has not been extensively investigated. We aimed to measure the relative rates of amputation and mortality in individuals with different stages of CKD compared to those without CKD, and to assess whether revascularization treatments might reduce these risks for PAD patients. Methods We conducted a thorough search of the literature across multiple databases, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. The risk of bias assessment was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment scale. All studies that reported relevant results in PAD patients were included. The statistical analysis involved the calculation of pooled prevalence estimates using a random-effects model, along with the performance of subgroup analyses and meta-regression to evaluate heterogeneity. Results We included fourteen observational studies encompassing a total of 554,270 patients with PAD that met the predefined inclusion criteria. Eleven studies reported on amputation rates in patients with and without CKD. Our analysis showed that CKD patients faced nearly double the risk of amputation compared to those without CKD (1.94; 1.90 to 1.97; P < 0.001; I 2 = 96.8%, P < 0.001). Additionally, a significant rise in mortality risk among CKD patients was observed across 14 studies, in comparison to patients without CKD (OR 2.04; 95% CI 1.99 to 2.08; P < 0.001; I 2 = 78.6%, P < 0.001). Moreover, we observed a graded increase in both amputation and mortality rates with the progression of CKD severity. In terms of therapeutic interventions, the potential of revascularization procedures to lower mortality and amputation rates appeared to be attenuated in the presence of CKD in PAD patients. Meta-regression analysis revealed that only a baseline diabetic population exceeding 50% exhibited a borderline association with amputation rate (β 0.422; 95% CI [-0.189; 1.035]) after adjusting for other covariates, including sample size, percentage of patients with critical limb ischemia, and follow-up time. Conclusion The significant association noted between CKD and risk of amputation and mortality with PAD, with this risk intensifying as renal insufficiency progresses. Furthermore, the effectiveness of revascularization procedures in reducing amputation and mortality rates is diminished in patients with PAD who also have CKD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.733
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0070.004
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it