MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Large scale EV-A71 2A protease mature and precursor expression setup and operation of Single Use Bubble Column Reactors: Litre-Scale Expression of Recombinant Proteins for Structural Biology and Drug Design (SBDD) v1

2025· preprint· en· W4412032435 on OpenAlexaff
Nathan T. Wright

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicInnovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation
Canadian institutionsDiscovery Centre
FundersNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious DiseasesNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsScale (ratio)ProteaseColumn (typography)Expression (computer science)Protein expressionSCALE-UPBubble column reactorRecombinant DNAComputational biologyBubbleBiologyChromatographyComputer scienceChemistryEnzymeParallel computingBiochemistryPhysicsGas bubble

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This protocol describes a single-use Bubble Column Reactor (suBCR) system for large-scale recombinant protein production in E. coli, addressing limitations of traditional shake-flask methods for structure-based drug discovery. The system enables parallel 1-liter batch cultivation using disposable bioreactor bags in a heated water bath with controlled aeration. Two enterovirus 2A protease variants were successfully expressed: wild-type Human Coxsackievirus A16 2A protease (Addgene 228632) and an inactive Coxsackievirus A71 2A protease with C110A mutation (Addgene 228633).The C110A mutation preserves the VP1-2A junction while eliminating catalytic activity, providing active and inactive variants for comparative studies that are suitable for crystallography. Cultures are grown at 37°C for 4 hours until exponential phase, then expressed overnight at ambient temperature (25-27°C) using auto-induction Terrific Broth media. The system achieved high yields with culture volumes of 5-22.6 L producing wet cell weights of 163.2-225.6 g. Quality control via nickel-magnetic bead purification and SDS-PAGE confirmed successful overexpression of both constructs. This scalable, cost-effective approach significantly advances protein production methodology for structural biology and drug discovery, offering increased throughput and reduced labor compared to conventional methods while providing sufficient protein quantities for crystallographic studies and antiviral drug development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicInnovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques InnovationFrench-language works237,207