MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412040672 · doi:10.1002/sia.70003

Speciation of Magnesium Surfaces by X‐Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS)

2025· article· en· W4412040672 on OpenAlexafffund
Sebastian Amland Skaanvik, Jeffrey D. Henderson, James J. Noël, Mark C. Biesinger

Bibliographic record

VenueSurface and Interface Analysis · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMagnesium Alloys: Properties and Applications
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsX-ray photoelectron spectroscopyBinding energyMagnesiumAugerGenetic algorithmChemistryChemical stateSpectral lineAnalytical Chemistry (journal)MetalAtomic physicsEnvironmental chemistryNuclear magnetic resonancePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Magnesium metal, alloys, and salts have ubiquitous uses as structural materials, components in energy‐conversion devices, and catalysts. The surface states and reactions that underpin these applications are commonly studied by X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). Yet, reported binding energies for the Mg 2p transition vary widely, making accurate speciation of magnesium surfaces by XPS notoriously challenging. We found that these literature discrepancies result from differences between charge referencing procedures, particularly due to the unusually high binding energy of adventitious carbon on MgO and Mg(OH) 2 . Relevant pure and mixed samples were analyzed to assess the chemical speciation for magnesium. The range of Mg 2p binding energies was only 1.2 eV for pure samples, insufficient for speciation in many cases. The Mg KLL spectral lines were studied and found to provide additional chemical information due to final‐state effects. The range of the modified Auger parameter ( α ’), which is also independent of charging, was found to be 2.9 eV. The position and shape of the Mg KLL spectral lines are reported, and their use for the speciation of mixed systems is demonstrated. Moreover, a curve‐fitting procedure for O 1s signals was developed, which can separate MgO and Mg(OH) 2 despite their overlapping Mg 2p signals.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSurface and Interface AnalysisSame topicMagnesium Alloys: Properties and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207