A deep active learning framework for mitotic figure detection with minimal manual annotation and labelling
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AIMS: Accurately and efficiently identifying mitotic figures (MFs) is crucial for diagnosing and grading various cancers, including glioblastoma (GBM), a highly aggressive brain tumour requiring precise and timely intervention. Traditional manual counting of MFs in whole slide images (WSIs) is labour-intensive and prone to interobserver variability. Our study introduces a deep active learning framework that addresses these challenges with minimal human intervention. METHODS AND RESULTS: We utilized a dataset of GBM WSIs from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Our framework integrates convolutional neural networks (CNNs) with an active learning strategy. Initially, a CNN is trained on a small, annotated dataset. The framework then identifies uncertain samples from the unlabelled data pool, which are subsequently reviewed by experts. These ambiguous cases are verified and used for model retraining. This iterative process continues until the model achieves satisfactory performance. Our approach achieved 81.75% precision and 82.48% recall for MF detection. For MF subclass classification, it attained an accuracy of 84.1%. Furthermore, this approach significantly reduced annotation time - approximately 900 min across 66 WSIs - cutting the effort nearly in half compared to traditional methods. CONCLUSIONS: Our deep active learning framework demonstrates a substantial improvement in both efficiency and accuracy for MF detection and classification in GBM WSIs. By reducing reliance on large annotated datasets, it minimizes manual effort while maintaining high performance. This methodology can be generalized to other medical imaging tasks, supporting broader applications in the healthcare domain.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".