Concentration dependent impact of hemolysis on lipase result: Does it clinically matter?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The hemolysis index (HI) interference threshold for the Roche lipase assay was recently decreased in the package insert from 1000 (10 g/L hemoglobin) to 100 (1 g/L hemoglobin), but limited data was provided to support the change. A decrease in the threshold could increase re-collection rates, disrupt laboratory workflow and change result interpretation. We performed interference studies to verify the new manufacturer HI claim at clinically relevant lipase concentrations. METHODS: Five lipase concentrations in lithium heparin plasma (36-227 U/L; n = 3-5) were spiked with hemolysates of varying hemoglobin concentrations (0, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 10, 12 g/L). Lipase concentrations and HI were measured on the Roche Cobas c503 analyzer in triplicate and singleton, respectively, and means and standard deviations of replicates were calculated. Interference was quantified as the absolute and percent differences from the 0 g/L control, then compared against several published total allowable error (TEa) thresholds. RESULTS: At 1 g/L hemoglobin, the HI was 95 ± 4 and yielded a 0.4-1.0 % difference from baseline across all lipase concentrations. Depending on the TEa criteria used, the lowest lipase concentration group (38 ± 2 U/L) either exhibited significantly (p < 0.05) elevated results starting at 3 g/L hemoglobin (HI = 289 ± 18) or no difference up to 12 g/L hemoglobin (HI = 1171 ± 22). All observed differences were within TEa limits for other lipase concentrations. CONCLUSION: Hemolysis affected lipase results in a concentration-dependent manner with an analytically significant impact only at lipase concentrations <40 U/L. This study stresses the importance of verifying new manufacturer claims and the value of assessing clinical change impact.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.014 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".