MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Transplantation of vitrified osteochondral allografts revealed equivalent cartilage repair to fresh osteochondral allografts in a swine model

2025· article· en· W4412046129 on OpenAlexafffund
Mohammadhamed Shahsavari, Kezhou Wu, Adibehalsadat Ghazanfari, Michael R. Doschak, Michael J. Turner, Mark Sommerfeldt, Janet A.W. Elliott, Nadr M. Jomha

Bibliographic record

VenueCryobiology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOsteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsThe King's UniversityQueen's UniversityUniversity of Alberta
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Alberta
KeywordsTransplantationAndrologyCartilageCryopreservationMedicineBiologySurgeryAnatomyEmbryoCell biology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Despite improvements in treatment options and techniques, articular cartilage (AC) repair continues to be a challenge for orthopedic surgeons. The use of osteochondral allografts for AC repair is currently limited by the availability and short shelf life of donor cartilage. AC vitrification-which is an ice-free cryopreservation technology-will increase the availability of viable graft tissue for large joint defects. Although different protocols have been developed for AC vitrification, it is still unknown if vitrified and fresh osteochondral grafts are equivalent in terms of long-term joint resurfacing efficacy. In the present study, we compared the ability of vitrified porcine osteochondral dowels to repair full thickness cartilage defects to that of fresh porcine osteochondral dowels kept for 21 days at 4 °C. Eighteen pigs were randomly assigned to three experimental groups according to the kind of osteochondral dowel they received transplanted to medial femoral condyles: Long-Term Vitrified osteochondral dowel group (n = 6), Short-Term Vitrified osteochondral dowel group (n = 6), and Fresh osteochondral dowel group (n = 6). Lameness score was evaluated before and after transplantation surgery. Animals were euthanized 6 months after transplantation to obtain medial femoral condyles, and the contralateral condyle was used as the positive (no defect) control. Samples were evaluated for macroscopic appearance, morphometric-microstructural measures of bone, chondrocyte density, proteoglycan distribution, and repair tissue quality. The overall repair quality in all grafts (including fresh controls) was incomplete likely due to the animal model and surgical technique. In the areas where repair was documented, this study demonstrated that the repair effect of vitrified transplanted dowels (both Long-Term and Short-Term) was equivalent to that of the Fresh dowels that were stored for 21 days at 4 °C when comparing lameness scores, quality of regenerated cartilage based on direct visualization of the gross appearance (ICRS Scores), chondrocyte density, proteoglycan distribution within the extracellular matrix, morphometric measures of bone quantity and microstructural quality, and microscopic histological characteristics of the repair tissue. The vitrification of osteochondral dowels will mitigate the short shelf life of commonly used fresh osteochondral transplants, significantly increasing their availability for use by physicians and patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.090
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCryobiologySame topicOsteoarthritis Treatment and MechanismsFrench-language works237,207