The impacts of transcranial direct current stimulation combined with aquatic neuromuscular training on pain, function, kinesiophobia, knee instability, and quality of life in knee osteoarthritis: a double-blind randomized trial
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is a significant challenge in elderly populations. Despite reporting the positive effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on pain reduction in patients affected by knee osteoarthritis, very few studies have investigated its efficacy in combination with aquatic neuromuscular training (ANMT). Accordingly, this study aimed to evaluate the effects of adding anodal tDCS to ANMT on pain, functional performance, kinesiophobia, joint instability, and quality of life in women with KOA. METHODS: This double-blind, randomized controlled trial with parallel-group and pre-test/post-test design involved 44 women diagnosed with KOA. Participants were purposively selected and randomly assigned to ANMT combined with real tDCS (r-tDCS; n = 22) or placebo (n = 22), both targeting M1. Pain was the primary outcome, assessed weekly and at the end of the six-week intervention. Secondary outcomes included functional performance, knee instability, kinesiophobia, and quality of life, measured using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), self-reported knee instability, the Tampa scale, and the Osteoarthritis Knee and Hip Quality of Life (OAKHQOL) questionnaire before and after the six-week interventions. The interventions consisted of 18 sessions, each lasting 20 min, followed by 60 min of ANMT. Mixed repeated measures ANOVA and one-way ANCOVA were utilized for within-group and between-group comparisons. RESULTS: A statistically significant difference in immediate effects of pain intensity between the two interventions was observed (p < 0.001, η2p=0.35). However, no significant difference was found between groups in the short term, six weeks post-intervention (p = 0.36, η²p = 0.02). Significant differences were found between the groups in knee instability (p = 0.04, η2p=0.10) and functional performance (p = 0.03, η2p=0.10). However, no significant differences were observed between the groups in kinesiophobia and quality of life (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Aquatic neuromuscular training combined with r-tDCS was more effective in reducing pain intensity immediately after intervention. However, no significant short-term differences were observed between the real and placebo groups. Furthermore, after six weeks, r-tDCS showed greater efficacy in improving knee instability and functional performance. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was prospectively registered in the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT20231106059975N1; Registration Date: 2024-07-08), https://irct.behdasht.gov.ir/trial/76061 .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".