MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412061617 · doi:10.2196/73510

Content Development for a Multilevel Intervention to Operationalize Behavior Change Theory and Improve Parenting Behaviors for Physical Activity: Descriptive Study

2025· article· en· W4412061617 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Breanne C. Wilhite, Erin Hennessy, Christina D. Economos, Jennifer M. Sacheck, Rachel Zive, Christine Odalen, Stephanie Herrick, Daniel P. Hatfield

Bibliographic record

VenueJMIR Pediatrics and Parenting · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicPhysical Education and Pedagogy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOperationalizationPreprintPsychologyIntervention (counseling)Developmental psychologyComputer scienceEpistemology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Theory-informed strategies for engaging parents in children's physical activity (PA) promotion show promise. However, behavior-change interventions must become more rigorous in both their application of theory and the reporting of its use to continue to advance the field. Objective: This study aims to elucidate how 2 behavior change theories were used to develop parent communication materials in a 20-week communications campaign, nested within a multilevel (school-home) intervention to promote children's PA. The innovation described in this study is derived from the Supporting Physical Literacy at School and Home (SPLASH) feasibility study (2021-2022). Methods: A team of 7 experts, including graduate students, researchers, faculty, and child PA specialists, collaboratively designed the process used to develop the intervention content. With experience in theory-informed interventions and health-related communication campaigns, they held recurring meetings to refine the approach. Results: A four-step process was used to develop the theory-informed parent communication materials: (1) establish a theoretical foundation for communication materials (ie, social cognitive theory and self-determination theory) and conduct focus groups with the priority population; (2) identify and select PA parenting behaviors aligned with evidence and behavioral theories to form PA parenting objectives that advance children's PA; (3) identify theoretical determinants of parent behavior change and outline methods for applying determinants to address PA parenting objectives; (4) operationalize theory-informed strategy and draft, review, and finalize materials. Parent communications were delivered through print materials and electronic channels, including email, text messages, Facebook (Meta Platforms, Inc), and activity videos. Conclusions: This descriptive study advances progress in the development of school-based PA promotion efforts seeking to incorporate parent engagement strategies by detailing how behavior-change theories can be operationalized to improve PA parenting behaviors. This methodology is valuable for others seeking to translate theoretical constructs into behavior-change communication messages.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.017
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.039
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.091

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0170.039
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.257
GPT teacher head0.510
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJMIR Pediatrics and ParentingSame topicPhysical Education and PedagogyFrench-language works237,207