Characterization of Immunity-Inducing Rhizobacteria Highlights Diversity in Plant–Microbe Interactions
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The narrow region of soil surrounding roots (rhizosphere) contains an astonishing diversity of microorganisms. Some rhizosphere bacteria can improve plant health and immunity, via direct competition with pathogens or by establishing heightened immunity in aboveground tissues, a phenomenon known as induced systemic resistance (ISR). To identify novel immunity-activating bacterial strains, we established a screening method from a library of agricultural soil-derived culturable bacteria, using Solanum lycopersicum (tomato) and the fungal pathogen Botrytis cinerea, the causal agent of gray mold disease. Here, we report the establishment of a screening method and the identification of 13 immunity-inducing strains in tomato plants, including a strain of Chitinophaga arvensicola. A detailed characterization of a subset of five strains, belonging to the species Bacillus velezensis, Paenibacillus peoriae, and Pseudomonas parafulva, revealed that only two of them triggered canonical ISR in Arabidopsis, indicating plant host specificity, alternative modes of action, or both. Furthermore, some of the strains displayed direct anti-microbial activity, and two strains became endophytic. We also found the requirement of the lipid-binding protein DIR1, which is an important factor for systemic acquired resistance, for ISR establishment in Arabidopsis, indicating a possible convergence of systemic acquired resistance and ISR signaling. Finally, we found that P. parafulva TP18m promoted root development as well as enhanced immunity. Taken together, we have established a screening system for immunity-inducing bacteria and identified taxonomically diverse bacterial strains that may be useful for agricultural application. Our characterization revealed diverse features for each strain, which highlights the complexity of the bacteria–host interactions in the rhizosphere. [Formula: see text] Copyright © 2025 The Author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it