Effects of the Ketogenic Diet on Gonadal Hormones: A Systematic Review
Bibliographic record
Abstract
CONTEXT: Ketogenic diets (KDs) are a set of medical nutritional therapies in which macronutrient consumption is consistently high in fat, adequate in protein, and low in carbohydrates. They have been shown to be clinically useful in a myriad of medical conditions. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to systematically review the literature aiming to evaluate the effects of a eucaloric, normoproteic, ketogenic diet (KD) on gonadal hormone levels in adults. DATA SOURCES: The PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) and Science Direct (via Scopus) databases were searched for relevant articles in November 2021, and the search was updated in December 2023. DATA EXTRACTION: The present systematic review was conducted according to the 6th version of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions and is reported according to PRISMA. This review only included studies with humans, such as randomized clinical trials, cohort studies, and cross-sectional studies. Levels of gonadal hormones were considered the primary outcome. DATA ANALYSIS: A total of 7 articles were included in the review: 3 studies were conducted with female participants only, and 4 with active or athletic males. The duration of the intervention was a minimum of 4 weeks and a maximum of 24 weeks. Most studies found oscillation of gonadal hormones, (such as total testosterone, luteinizing hormone [LH], follicle-stimulating hormone [FSH], estradiol, progesterone, and dehydroepiandrosterone) as an effect of the dietary intervention. CONCLUSION: A eucaloric isonitrogenous KD may offer (i) beneficial weight loss, (ii) a change in anabolic hormone levels (total testosterone, insulin-like growth factor 1 [IGF-1] in physically active men, depending on the intensity of exercise, the amount of fat-free mass when starting the diet, and the caloric volume of the diet), and a beneficial effect on gonadal hormones in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (by decreasing testosterone levels, improving the LH/FSH ratio, improving insulin sensitivity, and improving menstrual cycle regularity. Factors such as the study population, the presence of comorbidities, and the physical activity level of the participants may influence these effects. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration No. CRD42021256766.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.010 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".