MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4412070619 · doi:10.1021/acs.analchem.5c00288

Fast and Accurate Charge State Deconvolution of Protein Mass Spectra

2025· article· en· W4412070619 on OpenAlexaff
Kenneth R. Durbin, Matthew T. Robey, Joseph B. Greer, Ryan T. Fellers, Aaron O. Bailey

Bibliographic record

VenueAnalytical Chemistry · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicMass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsAbCellera (Canada)
FundersNational Institute of General Medical SciencesNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsChemistryDeconvolutionMass spectrumSpectral lineCharge (physics)State (computer science)Mass spectrometryAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Computational physicsStatistical physicsEnvironmental chemistryChromatographyAlgorithmQuantum mechanicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Charge state deconvolution is essential for efficient and effective protein mass spectrometry analysis. High-quality mass profiling is necessary to determine which proteoforms are present in protein samples and their relative abundances. In the pursuit of a well-rounded deconvolution solution, we detail an iterative charge state deconvolution algorithm named kDecon that has been tuned to provide high accuracy in its mass results while also delivering superb sensitivity toward lower abundance proteoforms in complex spectra. Here, the performance of kDecon as a mass determination algorithm for both targeted antibody and high-throughput proteomics analysis was benchmarked against existing deconvolution solutions. While the different deconvolution routines all proved robust for detecting the highest abundance protein species, kDecon ultimately showcased best-in-class precision for lower abundance proteoform mass profiling. Furthermore, kDecon results had up to 7-fold fewer false positives and simultaneously exhibited at least 20-fold speed improvements over the other algorithms. Overall, these deconvolution advances will contribute to enabling both routine and thorough intact mass profiling studies for biotherapeutics as well as improving the proteome coverage of top-down proteomics experiments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnalytical Chemistry→Same topicMass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications→French-language works237,207→