MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412071919 · doi:10.1038/s42003-025-08267-6

Brainbuilder: a software pipeline for 3D reconstruction of cortical maps from multi-modal 2D data sets

2025· article· en· W4412071919 on OpenAlexaff
Thomas Funck, Konrad Wagstyl, Claude Lepage, Mona Omidyeganeh, Paule‐Joanne Toussaint, Ting Xu, Katrin Amunts, Alexander Thiel, Nicola Palomero‐Gallagher, Alan C. Evans

Bibliographic record

VenueCommunications Biology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCell Image Analysis Techniques
Canadian institutionsJewish General HospitalMcGill UniversityMontreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
FundersNational Institute of Mental HealthHorizon 2020 Framework ProgrammeU.S. Department of Health and Human ServicesNational Institutes of HealthBundesministerium für Bildung und ForschungEuropean CommissionHelmholtz Association
KeywordsPipeline (software)Computer scienceSoftwareVisualizationArtificial intelligenceMesoscale meteorologyPattern recognition (psychology)NeuroscienceBiologyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mesoscale maps of brain architecture are important tools for characterizing the chemo- and cytoarchitectonic organization of the brain. These maps are essential for advancing our understanding of normal and pathologic brain function because they provide a bridge between neuron-level micro-scale imagining and macro-level population brain imaging. Here we introduce a method and software package called BrainBuilder for reconstructing 3-dimensional cortical maps from data sets of 2-dimensional post-mortem serial brain sections processed for the visualization of multiple different biological features. This pipeline can be applied to the brains from different species, without the strict need for a corresponding reference volume from the brain donor. As a proof of principle, we reconstruct data showing the distribution of multiple neurotransmitter receptor binding sites, and cell and myelin stained sections in the human and macaque brain. We show that BrainBuilder can serve as the basis for the development of future mesoscale 3D atlases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.120

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.003
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0040.003
Research integrity0.0010.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0360.012

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.369
Teacher spread0.326 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCommunications BiologySame topicCell Image Analysis TechniquesFrench-language works237,207