MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412072096 · doi:10.1177/07067437251355644

Self-Reported Dignity among People Admitted to Psychiatric Wards and Its Association with Suicidal Behaviour: Perte de dignité auto-évaluée chez les personnes admises dans des services psychiatriques et son association avec les comportements suicidaires

2025· article· en· W4412072096 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Matthew Buchok, Harvey Max Chochinov, Sarah Meora Kowall, Shay‐Lee Bolton, Renée El‐Gabalawy, Jennifer Hensel, James M. Bolton

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Psychiatry · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPatient Dignity and Privacy
Canadian institutionsCancerCare ManitobaUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDignitySuicidal ideationPsychiatryMedicineDepression (economics)DistressClinical psychologyMental illnessMarital statusMental distressPsychologyPoison controlMental healthSuicide preventionPopulationMedical emergency

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective Dignity is an important construct in vulnerable persons; however, there is limited research examining dignity in patients with mental illness. Our study aims to examine self-reported dignity-related distress among psychiatric inpatients using the patient dignity inventory (PDI) and investigate the relationship between this distress and demographic and clinical variables, including suicidality. Methods Between June 2021 and July 2022, 97 participants were recruited from two hospitals in Winnipeg, Canada. Participants were patients admitted to acute psychiatric wards, 18 years or older, and provided informed consent. Participants completed a series of standardized self-report measures including the PDI and validated measures of depression, alcohol use, and suicidal behaviour. Demographic and clinical information was also obtained from patient charts. General linear models were used to investigate the relationship between dignity-related distress and demographic and clinical variables. Results The majority of the study sample had moderate to high depression symptomatology (57.7%), previous psychiatric hospitalizations (67.4%), and previous suicide attempts (52.6%). Dignity-related distress was not associated with gender, sexual orientation, age, marital status, or education. Higher levels of dignity-related distress were associated with mental disorder comorbidities ( P < 0.01), greater depressive symptoms ( P < 0.001), and higher risk alcohol use behaviours ( P < 0.001). Increasing levels of dignity-related distress were associated with greater intensity of suicidal ideation ( P < 0.001) having at least one previous suicide attempt ( P < 0.001), and having a high desire to die during that attempt ( P < 0.001). Conclusion Among psychiatric inpatients, impairment in their sense of dignity was associated with greater clinical severity including both a history of suicide attempt and current suicidal ideation. Further investigation may lead to targeted interventions to mitigate dignity-related distress and improve patient outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.713
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of PsychiatrySame topicPatient Dignity and PrivacyFrench-language works237,207