MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412077318 · doi:10.1016/j.chstcc.2025.100194

Association Between Effects of Frailty and Delirium on Hospital Mortality in Critically Ill Patients in the ICU Requiring Noninvasive Ventilation

2025· article· en· W4412077318 on OpenAlexafffund
Ashwin Subramaniam, Ryan Ruiyang Ling, Wisam Al‐Bassam, Neil J. Glassford, Kimberley Lewis, Yahya Shehabi, DAVID B. PILCHER

Bibliographic record

VenueCHEST Critical Care · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIntensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityImpact
FundersCanadian Institute of PlannersSt Vincent’s Private Hospital BrisbaneSt John of God Subiaco HospitalMonash UniversityFiona Stanley HospitalFlinders Medical CentreIntensive Care SocietyGold Coast Convention and Exhibition CentreSir Charles Gairdner HospitalCalvary Mater NewcastleMacquarie UniversityRoyal Melbourne Hospital
KeywordsCritically illDeliriumMedicineIntensive care medicineEmergency medicineRetrospective cohort studyCritical illnessVentilation (architecture)Association (psychology)Mechanical ventilationInternal medicinePsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An increasing number of patients with acute respiratory failure are supported with noninvasive ventilation (NIV). Although one-third of the patients receiving NIV experience delirium, its cause largely is unknown. It is hypothesized that frailty may be a contributing factor. Does delirium have an association with hospital mortality in patients with and without frailty receiving only NIV? This was a retrospective, multicenter registry-based observational study using the Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Adult Patient Database. All adults (aged ≥ 16 years) with critical illness across 178 ICUs between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2022, with a documented clinical frailty scale score requiring NIV were included. The primary outcome was hospital mortality. We assessed the association between delirium and hospital mortality in patients with and without frailty, adjusting for acute illness severity at ICU admission, sex, hospital type, unplanned ICU admission, and if ICU admission happened after rapid response team review. We included 30,534 patients, of whom 12,872 patients (42.2%) were frail. Delirium was more prevalent in patients with frailty (10.0% vs 5.6%; P < .001). The in-hospital mortality was higher in patients with frailty (22.5% vs 9.0%; P < .001) when compared with those without frailty. Delirium was associated independently with higher mortality across all patients, regardless of the frailty status (33.2% vs 21.0%; adjusted OR [aOR], 1.59; 95% CI, 1.40-1.80). Furthermore, delirium was associated with smaller increases in hospital mortality in patients with frailty (aOR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.22-1.66) compared with those without frailty (aOR, 1.90; 95% CI, 1.53-2.35). Although delirium was associated with higher hospital mortality, the relative impact of this association was greatest in patients without frailty. These findings challenge the 1-size-fits-all approach to delirium management in the ICU, advocating for nuanced strategies that consider the broader clinical context, including frailty.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.119
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.119
Threshold uncertainty score0.888

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.119
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCHEST Critical CareSame topicIntensive Care Unit Cognitive DisordersFrench-language works237,207