MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4412079676 · doi:10.3168/jds.2024-26149

The effects of feeding increasing levels of camelina meal as a protein supplement on the performance of Holstein dairy cows

2025· article· en· W4412079676 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Z. Tadayon, Y. Rouzbehan, Mohammad Javad Abarghuei, Javad Rezaei

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Dairy Science · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicRuminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersFaculty of Arts and Social Sciences, Carleton UniversityTarbiat Modares University
KeywordsCamelinaMealFood scienceCamelina sativaHolstein CattleDairy cattleAnimal scienceMilk proteinMeat and bone mealBiologyFish mealAgronomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study aimed to assess the effects of feeding increasing levels of camelina meal (Camelina var. × Soheyl L.) as a dietary protein supplement to primiparous Holstein cows on feed intake, milk production, milk composition and fatty acid profile, nutrient digestibility, ruminal fermentation variables, microbial nitrogen synthesis, and antioxidant status. Eight Holstein cows took part in a replicated Latin square design (two 4 × 4 squares) of four 28-d periods and 4 diets containing soybean meal and 4 levels of camelina meal: (1) 0 g camelina meal/100 g DM (control), (2) 4.70 g camelina meal/100 g DM, (3) 9.50 g camelina meal/100 g DM, and (4) 14.20 g camelina meal/100 g DM. The cows were kept in individual tiestalls. The cows were given diets ad libitum, ensuring 5% orts during the experiment. We determined intakes; milk production and composition; in vivo digestibility of DM, OM, CP, and ash-free NDF; urinary purine derivatives; microbial nitrogen synthesis; rumen pH; ammonia-N; total and individual VFA; and protozoa numbers. Dietary replacement of soybean meal with camelina meal revealed no significant differences in DMI, milk production, FCM, protein and fat yields, MUN, feed efficiency, and apparent digestibility. Dietary camelina meal did not significantly affect ruminal pH; ammonia-N; VFA, acetic, propionic, and butyric acid concentrations; or total protozoa number. Milk SFA levels were significantly lower, and MUFA and PUFA were significantly higher in cows fed camelina meal compared with the control. There were no significant differences in levels of urinary allantoin, purine derivatives absorbed or excreted, or microbial nitrogen synthesis among the diets, but feeding camelina meal significantly increased total antioxidant capacity in the blood and milk. This study shows that camelina meal can be fed as a total replacement for soybean meal without adverse effects on animal performance and with a positive impact on milk's PUFA and antioxidant capacity. The substitution of camelina meal for soybean meal is a viable alternative for lactating cows in areas where water shortages preclude soybean cultivation. However, based on the statistical power analysis, especially for milk production traits and rumen fermentation variables, it is recommended that further research be conducted on this topic with a larger number of animals.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Dairy Science→Same topicRuminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology→French-language works237,207→