Potent Inhibition of Chikungunya Virus Entry by a Pyrazole–Benzene Derivative: A Computational Study Targeting the E1–E2 Glycoprotein Complex
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Chikungunya virus (CHIKV) continues to pose a significant global health challenge due to the absence of effective antiviral treatments and limited vaccine availability. This study employed a comprehensive in silico workflow, incorporating high-throughput virtual screening, binding free-energy calculations, ADMET (absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, and toxicity) analysis, and 200 ns molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, to identify new inhibitors targeting the E1-E2 glycoprotein complex, crucial for CHIKV entry and membrane fusion. Four promising candidates were identified from a library of 20,000 compounds, with CID 136801451 showing the most potent binding (docking score: -10.227; ΔG_bind: -51.53 kcal/mol). The top four compounds exhibited favorable ADMET profiles, meeting nearly all criteria. MD simulations confirmed stable binding and strong interactions between CID 136801451 and the E1-E2 complex, evidenced by consistently low RMSD values. These findings highlight CID 136801451 as a promising CHIKV entry inhibitor, warranting further in vitro and in vivo evaluation to advance the development of effective anti-CHIKV therapeutics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".