Multipronged biobehavioural intervention strategies for prevention and control of hypertension: A protocol for systematic review of education-based community trials
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Hypertension is one of the most pressing health challenges in sub-Saharan Africa, particularly South Africa. Evaluation of community-wide biobehavioural, preventative and control strategies for hypertension are necessary for planning and advancing primary prevention in the region. This systematic review aims to assess community-wide biobehavioural intervention strategies for hypertension prevention and control worldwide. This protocol follows the preferred items for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P). Databases: Medline, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Academic Search Complete, Cumulative Index for Allied Health Literature and African Journals (SABINET). Two independent reviewers will conduct article screening and data extraction. Primary data items include multipronged bio-behavioural interventions used for community-wide prevention and control of hypertension, intervention efficacy, and roles of forms and format, modes, and channels of intervention on efficacy. Methodological quality will be assessed using the mixed-method appraisal tool. Findings will be presented using narrative synthesis. Descriptive data will be summarized using frequencies and percentages. Using random-effect meta-analysis, efficacy of interventions will be evaluated. Heterogeneity will be examined using the Cochrane I 2 statistic. Meta-analysis will be conducted with aid of Comprehensive Meta-analysis version 4. The review will provide insights into preventive and control strategies used in different climes and their efficacy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it