MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412089684 · doi:10.1061/jsendh.steng-14534

Influence of Loading Direction on the Behavior of Steel–Grout Hybrid Joints for Mass Timber Panels

2025· article· en· W4412089684 on OpenAlexaff
Vincent Blériot Feujofack Kemda, Cristiano Loss

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Structural Engineering · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWood Treatment and Properties
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGroutStructural engineeringMaterials scienceGeotechnical engineeringEngineeringForensic engineeringComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a blended experimental, numerical, and statistical approach to characterize the influence of loading direction on the behavior of hybrid connectors used in mass timber panels. These connectors consist of a thick layer of epoxy-based grout surrounding steel rods, all embedded within the cross-laminated timber (CLT) panels. A series of 42 monotonic pushout tests were conducted to evaluate their structural performance parameters, including initial stiffness, yield resistance, and ultimate resistance. The specimens were tested in two orientations: half were loaded parallel to the face layers; the other half were loaded perpendicular to these layers. Following the experimental tests, a high-fidelity finite-elements model was developed using ANSYS commercial software to simulate the structural behavior of the hybrid connectors under various loading angles. This model was calibrated using the experimental results. Simulations were performed for different angles between the loading direction and the CLT face layers, including 0, π/6, π/4, π/3, and π/2 radians. Experimental and simulation results indicated that the connectors exhibited better structural performance as the loading angle approached 0°. The finite-elements model accurately captured the slip modulus, yield resistance, and ultimate resistance, achieving an accuracy of over 95%. Additionally, the model provided insights into the structural performance, yield mechanisms, and failure propagation of connectors at various orientations relative to the CLT face layers. Based on the finite-elements model’s outputs, trigonometric equations derived from Hankinson’s formula were developed to predict the structural performance parameters of the connectors as a function of the CLT layer orientations relative to the loading direction. These predictive equations demonstrated excellent performance, with coefficients of determination approaching 1.0 in several cases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Structural EngineeringSame topicWood Treatment and PropertiesFrench-language works237,207