MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412093735 · doi:10.37275/bsm.v9i9.1378

The Dual Role of Hypoxia-Inducible Factor-1α in Sepsis-Induced Immunomodulation and Organ Dysfunction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2025· review· en· W4412093735 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Harun Hudari, Mega Permata, Ratna Maila Dewi Anggraini, Raden Ayu Linda Andriani

Bibliographic record

VenueBioscientia Medicina Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRespiratory Support and Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOrgan dysfunctionSepsisMeta-analysisHypoxia (environmental)Hypoxia-inducible factorsMedicineImmunologyBiologyInternal medicineChemistryGeneBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Sepsis, a life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection, remains a leading cause of global mortality. Hypoxia-inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α) is a master transcriptional regulator of the cellular adaptive response to hypoxia but plays a complex, paradoxical role in sepsis. While essential for innate immune function, its sustained activation may amplify inflammation and drive organ damage. This meta-analysis was conducted to synthesize the evidence on the association of HIF-1α with key markers of immunomodulation and organ dysfunction in sepsis. Methods: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis following PRISMA guidelines. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science was conducted for studies published between January 2014 and December 2024. We included observational studies that measured HIF-1α levels in adult sepsis patients and reported outcomes related to organ dysfunction (Sequential Organ Failure Assessment [SOFA] score) or mortality, and immunomodulation (Interleukin-6 [IL-6] levels). Seven studies meeting the inclusion criteria were included in the final analysis. Data were pooled using a random-effects model. Standardized Mean Difference (SMD) and Odds Ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. Results: The seven included studies comprised 1,288 patients. The overall quality of the included studies was moderate to high as per the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The pooled analysis revealed that HIF-1α levels were significantly elevated in sepsis patients who died compared to those who survived (OR = 2.68, 95% CI: 1.55–4.64, p < 0.001), with moderate heterogeneity (I² = 45%). Furthermore, HIF-1α levels were strongly associated with greater organ dysfunction, as measured by the SOFA score (5 studies; SMD = 0.92, 95% CI: 0.51–1.33, p < 0.0001), with substantial heterogeneity (I² = 78%). HIF-1α levels also showed a significant positive correlation with the pro-inflammatory cytokine IL-6 (4 studies; SMD = 1.15, 95% CI: 0.65–1.65, p < 0.00001), with high heterogeneity (I² = 82%). Conclusion: This meta-analysis provides robust evidence that elevated HIF-1α levels are significantly associated with increased sepsis severity, characterized by greater organ dysfunction, a heightened pro-inflammatory state, and a higher risk of mortality. These findings underscore the maladaptive consequences of sustained HIF-1α activation in sepsis, positioning it as a critical prognostic biomarker and a complex, high-value target for future therapeutic modulation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.748
Threshold uncertainty score0.701

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.156
GPT teacher head0.429
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBioscientia Medicina Journal of Biomedicine and Translational ResearchSame topicRespiratory Support and MechanismsFrench-language works237,207