A feasibility assessment of micromill sampling for Rb‐Sr and Sm‐Nd geochronology of shergottites
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Accurate dating of Martian meteorites is crucial for understanding key events in the planet's evolution. However, not all Martian meteorites are amenable to dating techniques currently in use for these rocks. The priority of sample preservation precludes mineral separation methods for low‐volume specimens, whereas the less destructive in situ SIMS U‐Pb method depends on the availability of U‐bearing accessory minerals. Micromilling allows for spatially guided sampling of target phases down to the sub‐mm scale, therefore enabling chromatography‐based analysis while preserving the overall specimen. This study presents an evaluation of micromill sampling for extracting individual mineral fractions in situ from shergottites, the most common group of Martian meteorites, for Rb‐Sr and Sm‐Nd geochronology. Based on trace element content in major minerals in shergottites (pyroxene, plagioclase, olivine, and merrillite) and assuming that a minimum load size of 0.25 ng Sr and 1 ng Nd is required to achieve baseline isotopic precision (2 σ of ~240 ppm on 87 Sr/ 86 Sr and ~100 ppm on 143 Nd/ 144 Nd), the minimum required sample volume ranges in the orders of 10 5 –10 7 μm 3 for one Sr isotopic analysis and 10 5 –10 9 μm 3 for one Nd isotopic analysis. Considering the need for sample purity, significant limitations exist in the maximum sampling resolution of the micromill instrument (~40 μm for the conical carbide drill bit chosen for this study) with respect to shergottite petrography. Insufficient grain size, irregular morphology, and the presence of small inclusions may reduce the area that can be drilled per grain. Shock‐induced fractures, which sometimes act as pathways for terrestrial alteration, are pervasive in shergottites and create additional challenges for effective high‐purity sampling of the target phase. In addition, variation in trace element content in the target phases may result in the realistically required drilling volumes being orders of magnitude greater than the minimum estimates. Lastly, estimated drilling time per fraction may reach over 5 h for pyroxene (Sr, Nd), plagioclase (Nd), and olivine (Sr, Nd), increasing the susceptibility to a larger procedural blank as well as requiring constant, labor‐intensive monitoring for long durations. Based on these technical and physical constraints, we do not consider micromill sampling to be currently compatible with Sr isotopic analysis of olivine and Nd isotopic analysis of pyroxene, plagioclase, and olivine in shergottites. The feasibility of geochronology applications may be improved with future advances in analytical development, such as increasing the micromill sampling resolution and reducing the load size required for isotopic analysis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".