MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412096810 · doi:10.1136/svn-2024-003382

Predictors of futile recanalisation in patients with large infarct: a post-hoc analysis of the ANGEL-ASPECT trial

2025· article· en· W4412096810 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Tingyu Yi, Xiaochuan Huo, Xiaohui Lin, Mengxing Wang, Yanmin Wu, Zhi-nan Pan, Xiu-fen Zheng, Ding-lai Lin, Yuesong Pan, Zhongrong Miao, Wenhuo Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueStroke and Vascular Neurology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Health Commission of the People's Republic of ChinaNatural Science Foundation of Fujian Province
KeywordsMedicineThrombolysisModified Rankin ScalePost-hoc analysisStroke (engine)Internal medicineLogistic regressionMyocardial infarctionIncidence (geometry)CardiologyMultivariate analysisSurgeryIschemiaIschemic stroke

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Studies on futile recanalisation after endovascular therapy (EVT) for anterior circulation large vessel occlusion with large infarct were scarce. The present study aimed to explore the incidence and independent predictors of futile recanalisation in patients with large infarct. METHODS: This is a post-hoc analysis of the ANGEL-Alberta Stroke Program Early CT (ASPECT) trial. A favourable outcome was defined as a 90-day modified Rankin Scale score of 0-3; successful reperfusion was defined as extended thrombolysis in cerebral infarction 2b, 2c and 3 on final angiogram; and futile recanalisation was defined as unfavourable outcome despite successful reperfusion. We performed multivariate analysis to identify the predictors of futile recanalisation after EVT in patients with large infarct. RESULTS: A total of 183 patients were included: 91 (49.7%) patients had futile recanalisation and 92 (51.3%) had meaningful recanalisation. In multivariable logistic regression analysis, nonmodifiable factors included older age (age ≥68 years, OR=3.4, 95%CI 1.5 to 7.7, p= 0.003), female sex (OR=2.78, 95%CI 1.28 to 7.27, p=0.01), higher National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score (NIHSS ≥16, OR=3.1, 95%CI 1.2 to 8.3, p=0.035), diabetes (OR=3.1, 95%CI 1.2 to 8.3, p=0.017) and symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage (sICH) (OR=9.1, 95%CI 1.0 to 80.7, p=0.049), and modifiable factors included larger final infarct volume (FIV ≥174.7, OR=6.2, 95%CI 2.5 to 15.7, p<0.001) and postoperative respiratory failure (OR=14.1, 95%CI 1.6 to 124.8, p=0.018), which were independent predictors of futile recanalisation. CONCLUSIONS: Futile recanalisation occurred in approximately half of patients who had an acute stroke with large infarct after EVT in the ANGEL-ASPECT trial. Nonmodifiable factors that included old age, high baseline NIHSS score, diabetes mellitus, sICH and large FIV, and modifiable factors that included respiratory failure were independent predictors of futile recanalisation after EVT for large ischaemic strokes. Stroke-related pneumonia control may improve prognosis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.263

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStroke and Vascular NeurologySame topicAcute Ischemic Stroke ManagementFrench-language works237,207