Direct percutaneous treatment of iatrogenic superior gluteal artery injury using angioseal closure device: a novel technique
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Iatrogenic superior gluteal artery injury (SGA) following bone marrow biopsy is rare but potentially life-threatening. Due to the deep intrapelvic location of the vessel, conventional management with manual compression or surgical repair is challenging. Traditional management via endovascular coil embolization requires arterial access and vessel sacrifice. Case presentation We present a case of SGA injury resulting from a bone marrow biopsy in a patient with suspected T-cell lymphoma. The injury was successfully managed using a 6 french Angioseal closure device applied directly through the biopsy puncture site in the gluteal region, with the patient maintained in the lateral decubitus position. The approach achieved immediate hemostasis while preserving arterial patency. CONCLUSION: This represents the first reported use of an Angioseal device for direct percutaneous treatment of iatrogenic SGA injury. This technique offers an effective hemostasis and vessel preservation, expanding the interventional radiology's armamentarium.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".